Hacker News Reader

Not comparable - that's a very limited slice of AI we're talking about.

Yes, a very limited AI still devalued all that a human brought to the table.

Now AI models are getting both more general, and deepening their comprehension, at the same time. Rapidly.

If there are highly talented humans in your field today who would find your extra help more of a distraction than a help, then it’s likely more advanced models will to.

Not being critical. This applies to me too. All of us!

Chess is not a team sport.

Has Magnus or a similarly good player ever played against an AI using an AI to assist him? That sounds like it could be interesting.

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Carlsen%E2%80%93Niemann_contro...

This is not exactly what you asked, but it shows that high-level players are using AI to play better chess.

Hmm, there would be no point at this stage as there are no positions AI is not certain to have found at least as good a move as a human.

This is called centaur chess.

https://en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/Advanced_chess

As I understand it, chess ai just does better without dumb humans to overrule it these days.