Did it reason though? My understanding is that these models just give back the answer best statistically connected to the input text.
citation needed. This is an assertion you've made without any real evidence.
And this would rank them below rubbish, because that behaviour, of unfounded repetition, is directly unintelligent, and is what you want to avoid, the opposite of what we seek.
> So much of human "reasoning"
Description is not prescription; that millions of Spanish speaking people say 'Argelia' does not mean it is a good idea; that billions are illiterate constitutes a frequentistic norm, not a normative norm...
> We ping pong
Please don't. Evaluate your ideas and statements foundationally, and through foundational inheritance, and through rankings of doubts, and frequent checks and doubts, like the others do.