One anecdote is not even close for this to be reliable for life and death advice, especially with the high risk of hallucination and sophistry. This is survivorship bias at its finest.
The pedestals that our society has put professionals on are going to start tumbling very soon now.
And surely one anecdote makes a black box AI very trustworthy and reliable against human doctors. /s
> The pedestals that our society has put professionals on are going to start tumbling very soon now.
Nope. Not even close. The OP did not treat the patient by themselves, they reviewed the output with a human doctor.
I don't think even you yourself would begin to follow ChatGPT's advice and treat and inject yourself without input from an experienced human doctor based on ONE statistic of it saving someone's life especially them going to a second human doctor.
It’s only been available in beta to a significant number of people for about 18 months, hasn’t it?
It's a very good thing. Especially regarding GPT-4. Better than people fully trusting it and following its advice.
It's the core of techbroism.
LLMs have proven to be an excellent tool for data recall in this information age - but tech worshippers alwant to sell them as decision makers as well and that will cause more evil than even what Zuckerberg and co. accidentally brought to humanity.