Hacker News Reader

Comment by DavidKarlas | Hacker News Reader

I was thinking few days ago, In 20 years we will probably be able to say something like “Make a TV show that is mix of Game of thrones and Lord of the rings, has 4 seasons with 10 episodes each and main character is played by Tom Hanks and co-star Sandra Bullock” and you just start watching, probably tweak it as you go, saying more fighting, explore more story in desert about dragons…

View on HN

It's already happening without the help of an AI. We have too much junk. Can't find five good movies in a year. I wish I could have an option to hide the junk so I don't waste half an hour browsing(again) through the same stream of junk and in the end to watch the same old movie I've watched last time.

Stop browsing mindlessly and start searching proactively based on mood, taste and choices.

Searching with a TV remote is quite bad but you are right, I should make a list of movies I want to watch(old style internet research) and then get them from whatever source I can(stream, disc or torrent).

Out of interest, do you watch and enjoy TV? Because what you are describing sounds like a hyper-accelerated version of today's horrific landscape of derivative quantity-over-quality TV shows with little originality or suspense. Good writers can create those, but most viewers cannot attain those results via mere prompts.

They said In 20 years, suggesting it's not possible today. Seems reasonable to me that AI will be able to produce better quality content (books, video, music) than humans at some point.

I'm looking forward to having my own personal music stream that nobody else will ever hear.

The premise is the same as saying people can 3D-print their own widgets, nuts and bolts. The average person cannot do that to any reasonable level without a template that includes the right parameters. Templated entertainment fails because the viewer can see the ending coming a mile away.

It is the same with anything where AI is expected to fill the gaps. With a 3D print template you get something generic that just works. The last thing that people want in entertainment is something whose ending they can predict.

Writing screenplays is a skill, and AI provided by large corporations can only fine tune their output on the basis of whatever is out there, and the generic massively outweighs the original. Which side will AI go with?

>They said In 20 years, suggesting it's not possible today.

It's not exactly far away today. The building blocks are there. They're weak, but they are all fundamentally there.

My wife loves the show SWAT and I used Stable Diffusion to insert her into some still shots of the show in place of Chris and she lost her mind. I'm seeing people getting some pretty good results with video-to-video techniques using ControlNet, so my next experiment is going to be to see if I can do it with video, and use Eleven Labs to clone the voice and replace that too.

I'm virtually certain personalized entertainment of this nature is coming, and it's going to be huge.

I've had that same thought. How far away are we from true "video on demand"

- Show me the second season of Firefly, set after the events of Serenity - Remake Flash Gordon in the style of John Carpenter, with Roddy Piper as Flash - Create a 6 part mini-series, a modern day retelling of Seven Samurai, in 2050 Tokyo underworld, with Hiroyuki Sanada and Ken Watanabe - I'm too busy to read this obscure book from project gutenberg, make a movie of it for me - Here's a one-pager I wrote, give me a trailer for it with Keanu Reeves as the main star

Or next year...If the Porn industry hears about these LLM models...

Reply on news.ycombinator.com