If we can simulate a metric butt ton of them and get emergent behaviors somewhat similar to human computation, how can we guarantee that this simulated collection of these computing units isn’t “feeling” close to what a human feels? We’re just large collections of computing units as well.
I’m not quite saying we’re there yet though.
This whole development has really ruined my appetite for eating things that have intelligence.
The important word is simulate. It means it can accomplish a common subset of measurable phenomena. It certainly doesn't mean they are on pare on ontological status as a whole.
The debate seems to easily confuse notions like living entities, consciousness and intelligence, when they are three orthogonal considerations.
It is not reacting to pain but just generating language that looks like reacting to pain.
There's no call for analogical reasoning, the literal interpretation of the same action is right there.