Legally speaking, insurance, registration, and licensing is only required of drivers/transport engaging in commercial activity (taxi, cargo, etc).
This is not commonly known but there are court precedents that establish driving in a non-commercial capacity on publicly owned roadways is a constitutionally protected right under common law that cannot be infringed by state and local laws.
I've seen videos of non-sovereign citizens that follow this legal theory being vindicated and in some cases being awarded damages by courts for rights violations.
I don't believe its validity has sufficiently been proven false to make such a claim.
In all states, driving is a privilege and not a right. In all states as well as anywhere in the United States you are required by law to pay taxes.
In nearly all states, you are required to carry insurance for any vehicle you drive, even if for non-commercial activity.
Rather than argue otherwise, look up your state and look up driving laws. HINT: Laws are all spelled out in English for every state in the United States.
>Rather than argue otherwise, look up your state and look up driving laws.
This right to drive was discussed in more detail here [0] and a pretty exhaustive list of US court decisions is available here [1]
[0] https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=34869398
[1] https://wearechange.org/u-s-supreme-court-says-no-license-ne...
https://www.canlii.org/en/on/oncj/doc/2010/2010oncj740/2010o...
The judge quite thoroughly refuted every odd loop hole the defendant tried to claim existed.
My reply only concerned US law since the tweet was posted by an American.