Self spamming your own code base with comments that are either obvious, misleading or wrong was previously unfathomable to me.
Most people think I’m unrealistically pessimistic.
Well done.
Self spamming your own code base with comments that are either obvious, misleading or wrong was previously unfathomable to me.
Most people think I’m unrealistically pessimistic.
Well done.
An LLM may not fully comprehend the code like the original author, but it can offer a different perspective that may be valuable. The only argument I've seen against LLMs is that it may encourage laziness, but this is a flawed argument similar to those made against the printing press, which was said to make people illiterate.
As a reader of the docs: does it require discipline to refer back to the code when needed. Yes, but this is no different from the discipline required to write documentation in the first place. But with a key difference, the discipline is shifted from author to reader.
2. Everyone can see the same thing
3. It can be utilized for search
4. You can do both
Perhaps most importantly
5. It can be reviewed
https://www.reddit.com/r/ProgrammerHumor/comments/4ktp12/my_...
My “Well done” was not meant sarcastically!
It mostly only need the function and the type definitions (typescript) and it is usually very good at writing them and it does save me time.