Hacker News Reader

Comment by unixgoddess | Hacker News Reader

i think it means that the business deal would have brought in that amount of money if successful, not that he paid it for training. it was worth training because of all the money he could have received.

View on HN

> could have received.

But he didn't

If I somehow had the opportunity to do one of those things where you get one attempt at making a three-pointer for a million dollar prize, then I'd be well served by shooting a few over the week leading up to the event. I'm still unlikely to make the shot on the day but the expected value of the time spent on those practise shots is still definitely going to be worth it

But would you practice tying your shoes instead of shooting the shot?

Poster said they they failed for reasons other than their Q&A. Maybe they should have spent less practice on window dressing and more on substance. We don't know.

I assume that meant VC didn't think their idea was lucrative enough, despite loving their pitch.

Having had this shot at a sold out college game (for a more modest $500), it's weird playing under those very bright lights, against a glass backboard and the people filled stands behind it. Hard to practice that.

Thank goodness it wasn't for $1million.

If someone later described that prep, after failing the shot, as having been worth any amount of money, I do think that would be pretty weird, even if technically there might be some (difficult!) way of valuing it at some fraction of the $1m, according to whatever percent-likelihood chance improvement the pep afforded.

Sorry, the prep isnt worth money, the 10 minute conversation if successful was worth those amounts

Reply on news.ycombinator.com