There's no way for candidates to derive the real value from such a complex offer, let alone compare it to other offers. I imagine employers would like to keep it that way.
When comparing across countries, you'll also have to factor in how things are taxed in said countries and what you get in return for those taxes.
It isn't needed in the same way, but it makes a lot of things easier. Get seen faster, get money back from visits, etc.
https://www.economie.gouv.fr/entreprises/mutuelle-entreprise...
Some companies present it as a benefit, typically if using Alan
For me at least, this wouldn’t really be a deciding factor among competing job offers.
In Norway (about 9% of the population [1]) at least it appears to be similar to the UK (about 13% or respondents to a survey[2])
So I'm not sure if that counts as very common and in Norway it is largely a perk offered by companies as part of the salary package rather than something that individuals choose for themselves.
On the other hand Denmark has about twice as many people with private health insurance [1] as Norway and about the same population.
[1] https://www.nrk.no/norge/nesten-en-halv-million-nordmenn-har...
Public health tends to have better resources, but longer wait times. Private health has shorter wait times, though these would definitely increase if more people started using it.
It's common for employers to subsidise the private insurance at least.
And no, it's not messed up like in the US, although it's a large expense by European standards/cheap by US standards (the insurance companies raise the rates every year, and are protected by legislation in doing so, a bit like a utility company).
- their are no eligible for public insurance (only impacts a very small number of people, who are in many cases "independently wealthy", i.e. are not actually working)
- have very specific employment structures (most public school teachers benefit from having a private insurance due to certain government benefits paid to them)
- require or want certain benefits not offered by public insurance
- think that because of their special circumstance, private insurance will work out cheaper for them long-term (usually when you have the financial capacity to enter the private system at a very young and healthy age)
Well while private insurance is obviously available everywhere in some/many(?) countries employers only provide it for a very small proportion of workers.
Like, if I'm comparing two offers, the difference in money value of the benefits provided by the best offer and the worst offer (let's assume that apart from some fancy words they're really providing the bare minimum required by EU law) is going to be at most something like 10% of the compensation - but the difference in offered salary may easily be much, much more than that.
Sure, things like performance-determined pay/bonuses may be a big part of the total compensation in some areas (e.g. sales) but not as much as in USA, and benefits even less so; in EU market generally the contracted amount is not that far from the total compensation.