JPMorgan says the U.S. is probably headed for a recession
fortune.com
fortune.com
https://edd.ca.gov/en/jobs_and_training/Layoff_Services_WARN
Salesforce, Atlassian, Truepill, Waymo, Zoom, Rivian, Impossible foods, etc
So if the law says you have to notify 2 months in advance, they’ll instead give you at least 2 months severance, lay people off first, then announce through here.
I felt I had extra information when I found out about WARN of NYC, but shortly after learned about the work around above. I think the same workaround is used in other states but not 100% certain.
I think the layoff w/severance is a better setup. When it happens I don’t need to pretend to work, I can focus on finding the new gig instead.
There is also a federal WARN Act.
> They usually work around this by providing a “severance” that covers the legal period of time before they have to notify their employees;
This is, IIRC, possible in some state systems and under the federal WARN Act, its technically not possible under the California WARN, though the somewhat similar practice of fully-paid no-duties “employment” for the notice period is. This is worse in some respects (a during-employment non-compete can remain in place) and better in others (you are employed for health benefits purposes, so the COBRA clock of 18 or 36 months doesn’t start until the end, not the beginning, of the notice period, etc.)
Nothing in life is free, and the easy money we had, especially post COVID craziness, at some point has to have a cost.
(1) In a growth period that will last until the US ends, or
(2) In a recession, or
(3) Heading for a recession (equivalently, “in an economic expansion”, if you are more a “glass currently full” than a “glass will sometime in the future be empty” type).
There are literally no other options.
OTOH, I hope that the Fed thinks that a recession is imminent, because if it does and acts like it, then it is, ipso facto, less likely to actually occur, and more likely to be shallow and short if it nevertheless does, and moderate monetary stimulus without concurrent fiscal stimulus (and politically fiscal stimulus just isn’t probable with this Congress) might slow the decline of inflation, but isn’t going to turn restoke inflation.
> There are literally no other options.
When growth is increasing or steady you're heading away from a recession; it's only when growth is declining that you're heading for a recession.
(In fact, there isn’t even an actual function, just declared peaks and troughs; between peak and trough is “recession”, between trough and peak is “expansion”, and if you are in one – unless it goes on forever – you are heading for the other. The only nontrivial prediction regarding “heading for” is how soon, not are we.)
But also I don't like your definition of "heading for" at all. When I leave my house to go to work, I am not "heading for" my house, despite the fact that I will inevitably return.
Not quite, but there is certainly only 3 scenarios, just as shown by a graph. It can go up (growth), it can go down (recession), or it can be flat (stagnation).
GDP and unemployment are blunt instruments.
Though if the US dies it is not gonna save me either way.
They do not mean “the US dies”.
Current inflation isn’t that high (YoY is still high because its trailing), and if there is a recession, it will naturally fall faster, and easy money is the natural policy in those conditions, independent of debt concerns (which monetary policy generally is, that’s kind of the point of an independent central bank.)
> we can avoid default by printing more money
isnt "printing" usually done through issuing bonds?do those increase inflation?
Employment in Greece in 2010: 4.6 million.
Employment in Greece now: around 4.0 million.
Sure the unemployment rate has gone "down". That's because the youth gave up and simply moved from Greece. The GDP per capita will improve because of that but their GDP in constant prices never recovered (and is around 2002-2004 levels).
We are definitively in an interesting time. More interesting than the cold war era? I don't know but we shall see.
Two blocs are emerging. One is largely unified around shared cultural interests in resilient democracy and defence of human rights. The other is a hodge-podge of malcontents, allies-of-convenience and one strong but largely regional power (i.e. China).
If we look at this as a political struggle then we have to look at the problem-solution ledger to see who holds the advantage.
The US (and the West) have issues with an imbalance of power and wealth, and growing numbers of disillusioned, young voters - this is the problem statement. What is the solution that the non-aligned movement can offer? Worse inequality? Fewer rights? What?
The non-aligned countries have fractuous political bases and are shoring up their systems by cracking down on dissedents, attacking neighbours and attempting to corrupt other nation's foreign policies. No one is lining up to migrate to these countries, no one is holding them up as a beacon of rightousness (outside of the wingnut extremes, of course).
Contrast this to the Cold War. The Soviets held a significant sway over the "International Left". They had answers to the problems of the West. Not good answers, but good enough to sway a lot of students and intelligentsia.
China has no allies of note. Russia is a basket case. The rest of the non-aligned bloc are essentially local dictators trying to keep the pin in their respective grenades. All of them are experiencing the same struggle of either a rapidly aging population with no migration, or a rapidly growing youth who want a better life. For example, China's median age is rising 6 months for every year that passes, and they are a long way from being a sustainable, powerful economy.
These are interesting times in the political sense but unless the West starts kicking a lot of "own goals" - which is very possible but not exactly probable - then the US (and to a lesser extent the EU) will own this century as well.
The problem is that with modern politics and all its tools, logical (proposed) solutions aren't needed. Éric Zemmour, multiple times found guilty of stoking racism on TV, got 2.5 million votes/7% of the presidential vote in France on a platform that basically consisted of "France is no longer France, let's ship everyone of foreign descent to where they come from, ban Muslims, rename every person with a foreign name, screw the EU". If you think about it for more than a few seconds, that's just terrible on multiple levels and would ruin the country alongside millions of lives. Yet 2.5 million agreed with him? Yeah, he was heavily sponsored by a shithead billionaire, but still. Similarly with Le Pen, who got 8 million for 23%, had a vague populist "foreigner's fault, EU's fault, we'll give money to the poor to subsidise fuel consumption, etc." platform, while literally being bankrolled by Russia (multiple favourable loans from banks close to Putin and friends which saved her party).
Brexit was merely the first major "Western" own goal. We'll see also how climate change changes the field.
In other Western countries it is not uncommon for 7-10+% of the vote to go toward extreme right-wing parties. This is not the death knell of Democracy. 10% of the vote is a long way from winning government.
The problem for would-be dictators who are trying to usurp the West's governments is that, once things get tough under their leadership, the population turns against them very quickly. Take the Tories in the UK - if an election were to be held today they would likely become only the third largest party in the UK lower house. Similarly the conservative Coalition in Australia; they were trounced in both state and federal elections after their competence and corruption became clear.
The West takes some hits from time to time. It's strength is in its ability to recover.
The excesses and failures of the system (and the degree to which its "communism" was nothing but authoritarianism draped in a red flag) were not always clear until well after the fact.
Contrast that with today, where we may not have a perfect window into China, but we can certainly see a lot of what's going on there, including reprehensible things like the Uighur genocide, and the degree to which China's "communism" is heavily colored by capitalism on the one hand, and authoritarianism on the other.
Laughs in WWII
Its not even the first time since the end of the Cold War.
> The US dollar is being challenged from multiple fronts and one of them is Crypto. (though also the fact it’s being mismanaged by its own creators is not helping either).
So, I’m just about a half-century old, and since I became politically aware – which was pretty young – I’ve been hearing that exact line (except with something else, usually “Gold”, in place of crypto until recently) continuously that entire time.
In other words, diversify. Hope that the areas that grow make up for the areas that implode, or at least that they don't all implode.
yeah this is what i meant by this comment.