MSM still have some of the problem mentioned by the author ("urgent but unimportant breaking news", "insights about the royal family", "things that are true but irrelevant"). NYT is also prone to writing "stories designed to demean, degrade or intentionally inflict distress with little recourse available" since their style differs from WSJ whose news section are written strictly in reverse pyramid style.
But yeah, reading MSM news without looking at social media discussions of those news can address at least 80% of the problems described by the author. The information explosion is irreversible and the Internet allowed higher parallelism and lower latency in consuming information compared to TV/Radio/Newspapers. Some degree of exhaustion is inevitable unless one trains themself to properly detach and disconnect on the regular.