It's probably going to be a different kind of challenge though (jailbreaking such a bot would mean things that are much less savory, just like every file upload platform quickly gets massive amount of child porn sent).
The CP thing is going to open up a can of worms. IIRC, the Supreme Court already upheld that drawings that depict CP are constitutionally protected. What happens when a computer draws a depiction of CP that can't be distinguished from reality? I guess it's protected but it'll make it much harder to identify real CP.
> There have been convictions based on child heads photoshopped onto adult bodies. Generative images will be treated the same.
The former suggests the latter is not true, unless it is generative images provably using the likeness of an actual specific child. (Of course, the Supreme Court can go against its prior precedent, but assuming it will do so is not usually the best prediction unless there have been some very clear signals.)
DeepFakes are getting pretty good. The potential for revenge porn is super high.
And the rabbit-hole of dopamine chasing when you're able to generate custom porn is just frightening. Many young boys will figure out how to access that when they're 13 and won't know a life without it.
I'm terrified of the internet world my kids are going to be in.
When my generation grew up the internet was much smaller and less harmfull. Almost nothing you could do would affect your AFK life.
Can you quantify this? The internet is more centralized and moderated now. “Moderator” wasn’t a job when I first got online. There’s a pretty strong argument that the internet is more safe than it used to be.
No video. Hardly any pictures. Static sites. The computer was not used for anything important like bank services or storing personal info other than some party invite letters with clipart.
You would have to get out of your way to put your self in harm's way.
Probably better to just encourage them to live a healthy, outgoing lifestyle.