Grace Hopper on Late Night with David Letterman (1986) [video]
youtube.com
youtube.com
"I didn't... it was the first one."
Never cared for her, but jesus how can someone be so cruel to a young girl in the middle of a life crisis?
https://www.independent.co.uk/arts-entertainment/tv/news/dav...
A lot of comedians seem to hold him in high regards, which I never understood, but that's probably on me. But he really does seem like a massive prick.
Yeah yeah, common foe (this was around ww2), I know. But still.
That nano and pico seconds example is such a nice example of taking a difficult scientific concept and getting it across, in a way that I'll never forget.
Wow, she enlisted at 37 in 1944. That's impressive.
EDIT: I hate to #nit god like Comic Book Guy, but a picosecond is a trillionth of a sec and femtosecond is a quadtrillionth.
Grace Hopper on Letterman - https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=16555400 - March 2018 (1 comment)
Grace Hopper on Letterman - https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=8967077 - Jan 2015 (1 comment)
Grace Hopper on Letterman - https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=4456613 - Aug 2012 (2 comments)
FWIW, when I became STAR Student in high school, my mother bought me a necklace with a starfish on it to mark the occasion. She was looking for a "star" of some sort and the starfish was all she could find.
So maybe someone else bought them because of her rank and she wore them in part to honor that memory and that relationship-- family, friend, whatever. That's something people sometimes do.
As I said, I doubt that's what the ear rings are.
First, they do call her by her rank in the video.
Second, it's common in military culture for a retiree to be listed as [their rank] (RET) to indicate their Retired status.
Third, the video is from 1986. Policies and culture can and typically do change over the course of several decades.
If you served only a few years and did not reenlist, no, it's not appropriate to call yourself by your former rank. But retirees are free to use their rank so long as they don't misrepresent themselves as if they are still active duty, generally speaking.
I was in the Marines, both have the rank of Corporal. I asked a friend and he pointed me here: https://www.defense.gov/Contact/Help-Center/Article/Article/...
You are right about the use of rank by retirees.
The example I gave is wrong or rather, more pertinent to active duty when operating in a civilian capacity. The Navy and Marines are the only branches that have specific rules about that. Wearing your insignia as an earring is what I was addressing and that is still very taboo. I served under Mattis and I'd be floored if I saw him wearing four star bars in a suit.
Remember this woman was an Admiral(?) and a groundbreaker. Maybe she made the tradition. Not a lot of Navy folk (publicly) wearing dresses before either.
That was my point, badly made. There were likely no traditions regarding menopause or menstruation before women joined for instance. There was a need to 'make tradition'.
Whether that applies to decorative dangly earrings worn during interviews, I suspect there was some part of tradition that was lacking clarity.
Sailors have been known to wear earrings. I mean male sailors.
But thank you for your informative comments.
I wonder if WW2 felt more far away at that time, then the 80s feel today, even though both are 4 decades?
Nothing is wrong with things being available on Youtube or podcasts. The point is that much (if not most of it) is only available there and broadcast TV sits at the bottom of an ocean of emotion that exerts such extreme pressure that free thought cannot occur.