> going to agree to cease impacting, harvesting, etc wildlife
There is deep precedent for successful conservation programs. The anarchy of our international system makes this difficult. Filling the seas with toxic byproducts of war isn’t the answer.
There is deep precedent for successful conservation programs. The anarchy of our international system makes this difficult. Filling the seas with toxic byproducts of war isn’t the answer.
The buggy has lost the trailer. What? Is the claim there is no hypocrisy in war?
You proposed violence as a solution to the problem. I’m arguing that’s untenable.