10 days fasting and calcium/vit d supplements increases bone mineral density
sciencedirect.com
sciencedirect.com
I know it shouldn't have a huge impact on my assessment of a study, but when I see that they were looking for not-x and found x, it makes me feel substantially more confident in the result. It only guarantees that they were not p-hacking, and doesn't have any bearing on other aspects that would affect the validity of the results.
Very happy to see your comment and I def agree, if looking for specifically not-x and found x it also increases my trust in an article A LOT.
Prolonged fasting is known to increase growth hormone production
Growth hormone promotes growth of bones and cartilage
One thing bodies are very good at is preserving stuff when there is little of it, while fasting. Did you know you will be wasting much less muscle if you go on a complete fast than if you do calorie restricted diet? (please don't do calorie restriction)
So this result is interesting but not really surprising to me. I would assume that if our bodies work overtime preserving stuff there is a possibility they will do the same to calcium. After all we are already built to send excess calcium into our bones.
I must be doing something wrong. Every time I've tried fasting for more than a day, breaking the fast was painful. My throat always hurt too much to enjoy the meal.
If you try it, it's probably best to follow the advice to stop when it gets bad and don't tough it out.
I lost 60 pounds once, then regained it back and then some. I lost it again but the second time I made it my mission to understand what I do and make it stick. It seems to be working.
It is better to get healthy to loose weight that loose weight to get healthy. With healthy habits and healthy food your body will naturally shed unnecessary weight over time.
The second time I lost weight, for good, I focused on building good eating habits. Learning new healthier recipes (to displace unhealthy food). Running every day. Intermittent fasting rather than restricting calories. Building metabolic flexibility so my body is good at living off of its fat stores.
I was loosing up to 15 pounds a month for three months straight while not feeling hungry.
I would suggest to start with regular daily fasting. This means you eat within short window of time every day (max 4-6h) and the rest you get by with no calories. It takes about 2 weeks to a month for a person to adjust depending on your overall health, age and whether you are insulin resistant.
Once you get adjusted, you can try to restrict carbs a bit. Carbs are responsible for most of the hunger feeling. When I cut carbs my hunger ended completely. Cutting carbs (with restricted eating window) will force your body to adjust to functioning on your fat stores alone.
Please, be mindful none of this requires cutting calories. You can eat as much as you want, just keep your feeding to a short window every day and try restricting carbs and replace them mostly with fats. Ideally you would also want to pay attention to what kind of fats -- refined ones are usually the worst.
Hunger is your body signalling inability to get fuel for its critical processes. Given that most of us have hundreds of thousands of calories of fat (even if you look relatively lean), it is a bit preposterous idea that should be understood by your body having large stores of fuel but being unable to access them when it needs.
This might be because there is insulin present (any levels of insulin basically block your fat metabolism). Or it might be because you have never exercised your fat metabolism and now suddenly you require it to provide a lot of energy which it is not equipped to do.
This is solved by simply exercising it which means allowing your body to metabolise your stomach content and then waiting some more so that it has to reverse its processes to start metabolising fats. 16-18 hours is what is necessary to get there and that's why 4-6 hour eating window comes from -- so that you can train your fat metabolism a bit, every day.
With healthy fat metabolism you should be able to go on a prolonged fast and it should be enjoyable.
I'm at 60kg I think, for 1.83m, it's not underweight for my body shape - long legs, thin hip, arms & wrists, I often have huge meals, that way I can spend at least 20h without eating, but doing multiple-days fasting would be difficult unless I stay in bed
I've never worried about what I eat. My weight has been more or less constant. I know other people have to be very careful or they easily put on more weight. There is very little fat on me (maybe I could go a little bit leaner but I mostly don't worry about it).
That said, I think extended fasts are not about managing your weight, they're intended to force your body into a different mode. I'm pretty sure they're not an efficient way to reduce your weight (more activity + a bit more control over what you eat would be better). If you want to increase your weight without being fat then resistance training + eating more.
exactly, usually every week, I've a few days with high fruit, depending on the season. The rest of week if more standard (rice, onions, garlic is my simple go-to) and with that one I don't need more than 1 large meal a day
Also, certain conditions (including but not limited to T2 diabetes) can make fasting like this dangerous. I believe kidney problems are another one
That was many years ago. I’d like to try again with the right mineral support and lower intensity now that I actually have some fat to burn, but I don’t think I have the mental strength or focus for it.
from https://www.eurekalert.org/news-releases/891683:
A review published in The Journal of the American Osteopathic Association found Vitamin D can't be metabolized without sufficient magnesium levels, meaning Vitamin D remains stored and inactive for as many as 50 percent of Americans.
"People are taking Vitamin D supplements but don't realize how it gets metabolized. Without magnesium, Vitamin D is not really useful or safe," says study co-author Mohammed S. Razzaque, MBBS, PhD, a professor of pathology at Lake Erie College of Osteopathic Medicine.
...
Patients with optimum magnesium levels require less Vitamin D supplementation to achieve sufficient Vitamin D levels.
phytic acid: https://www.webmd.com/diet/foods-high-in-phytic-acid
When you eat foods high in phytic acid, the molecules bind with certain minerals in your digestive tract, including:
Calcium Magnesium Iron Zinc Chromium Manganese
Once this occurs, your body no longer has access to these nutrients.
In higher doses, it's a first-line laxative administered prior to routine surgery.
Blood tests confirm my levels are right on the money.
Not a doctor, not medical advice.
That said, 10 days seems a bit short for death, but yeah if you are in one of those 3 groups (high sports, extreme low fat, or with some disease) I would not take fasting lightly.
They were also taking a small amount of vitamin D. Not sure how much that matters, but it's worth mentioning.
Keep your phosphates ( and other electrolytes) normal and don't break the fast with lots of carbs
> The clinical features of the refeeding syndrome occur as a result of the functional deficits of these electrolytes and the rapid change in basal metabolic rate.
> Any patient with negligible food intake for more than five days is at risk of developing refeeding problems
This is something that applies to holocaust survivors and hunger strikers.
I do agree that at 10 days (YMMV!) you probably don't need those crazy refeeding ramp-ups of broth and soups for 1-2 days then soft foods for another few days, etc, but also don't just stuff yourself until you cannot move! Since you can chose, take a couple of light/easy to digest meals before going back to normal.
https://cchcs.ca.gov/wp-content/uploads/sites/60/CG/HSFR-Car...
Odd how this part often gets ignored when his example is cited.
It's not a surprise that his lifespan was shorter than average.
Given his death was a quarter of a century after he finished his fast, I'm not sure it makes the causal implication you are suggesting.
Given all of the purported health benefits of fasting I see touted on HN, and given how long he fasted, if anything I'd expect him to have lived to 100.
Allegedly health problems from obesity and stomach bleeding killed him. Questionably related to the fast,probably related to the health problems that got him to do the fast in the forst place.
E.g. one lady (1st case in the lnk below) who fasted for 4 months ended up in the hospital for 3 weeks with cardiac arrhythmias and they also found her heart tissue muscles were scared and filled with holes (I believe thats what vacuolated means)
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC1238550/pdf/wes...
I'm a fan of a 7 day prolonged fast, but not for anything longer
"Remember, to be healthy you need to have 5 small meals during the day. Don't let yourself get hungry," cry the Western dieticians.
The fast served as a kickstart toward weight loss and in a way a test of my resolve.
I'm continuing to fast fwiw, doing what is known as "rolling 48s" which is just a large meal every other day. I went for a couple mile jog last night after starting to eat again and felt pretty good so I'm going to keep doing that while fasting for short periods and see where this takes me.