Twitter uncloaks a year's worth of DMCA takedown notices, 4,410 in all
arstechnica.com
arstechnica.com
For example: http://chillingeffects.org/dmca512c/notice.cgi?NoticeID=1860...
Is it really illegal to link to infringing material?
Oh.. that's right. http://www.2600.com/news/112801-files/universal.html
Wow, that's so stupid. Why don't they just strip the hyperlink part and leave the URLs un-linked? It'd be a nice legal way to comply while disagreeing.
I suppose there could also be some sorts of material where 160 characters could exceed quoting for fair use. Such as haikus.
I do not understand all the takedowns because of mere mentions of pirate sites, or inclusion of their names, or even linking.
Has linking really become illegal? That was one of the nightmare scenario people were worried about some years ago, but which was dismissed as something that would never happen.
I completely and totally contest that a URL to an actual site is a copyright violation. (Barring the extreme cases such as a URL containing a haiku, but that doesn't seem to be the case in any of the incidents listed.)
I'd surmise it is because to non-technical users, the distinction between a "link" to the content and the "content" itself is something they don't understand. From their point of view, the "link" is the content because when they click the link, the content appears.
The vast majority of atty's filing dmca notices would fall into the non-technical user category.
>Question: Why does a user-generated content site get DMCA takedown notices for links users have posted?
>Answer: Many copyright claimants are making complaints under the Digital Millennium Copyright Act, Section 512(d), a safe-harbor for providers of "information location tools." These safe harbors give providers immunity from liability for users' possible copyright infringement -- if they "expeditiously" remove material when they get complaints. Whether or not the provider would have been liable for infringement by users' materials it links to, the provider can avoid the possibility of a lawsuit for money damages by following the DMCA's takedown procedure when it gets a complaint. The person whose information was removed can file a counter-notification if he or she believes the complaint was erroneous.
http://chillingeffects.org/dmca512c/notice.cgi?NoticeID=1807...