I think those emerging abilities are really interesting from a philosophical point of view, especially on the matter of consciousness.
It seems it really reinforce the illusionist point of view on the hard problem of consciousness, eg it doesn't really exist. It seems to reinforce most functionalist theories in fact. I would be really interested in what Chalmers think of those emerging abilities and how he update his theories.
Qualia does not exist
Subjective experience does not exist
Consciousness does not exist
There's nothing wrong with acting unethically or immoral because nobody actually experiences any harm because nobody experiences anything
Does anyone really think that's true?
The first three self-constrain impulses to the contrary on morality behaviors.
I'm not sure what you mean that it doesn't exist in a classical sense. That qualia, subjective experience and consciousness are not concrete entities? That something doesn't exist if its an emergent property or that something doesn't exist if its a process?