It’s just fancy auto complete to you? You honestly can’t see the capability it has and extend it the future?
What’s that saying about “it’s hard to get someone to understand something when their salary depends on their not understanding it”.
I don't understand why we can't look at the potential, or even current, capabilities of these LLMs and have a real conversation about how it might impact things.
Yet so many folks here just confidently dismiss it.
"It doesn't even think!" -- OK, define thinking?
"It doesn't create novel ideas!" OK -- what do most devs do every day?
"It is wrong sometimes!" OK -- is it wrong more or less often than an average dev?
Yes, this is arguing semantics but in this particular case, semantics is the whole point.
That's not what "the science says", it's the title of an article that someone put on arxiv.
The article has no theoretical results, just a shoddy empirical demonstration of... something. The author claims that the something is an LLM simulating a Turing machine. But, is it? Really?
Well, here's how the article concludes:
>> Hopefully the reader has been convinced by this point.
"Hopefully" is not how you show computational universality of a neural net architecture. This is how:
https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S002200008...
i.e. with maths. That article you link to is a bunch of hooey.
What I'm seeing now is that some kind of intelligence seem to emerge from these models, even though under the hoods it is just a bunch o matrix multiplications.
Who's can say for sure that our own brains doesn't work similarly? Maybe human intelligence is something that emerges from similar primitives and AGI will simply be a really large language model.
I mean we already did stupid chat bots in the 90s with convoluted if-else-spaghettis that imitated Eliza. That could already hold for some sentences... GPT-4 now holds much longer, but still you can easily drive it to the point where it starts "looping" and not provide much more value, especially if you are more expert => makes me so far hope that this length will grow more, but still.. in my "sessions" did not (gladly) find anything emerging beyond the first wow and surprising answers... not even close to that.
Here's a session I just ran on llama.cpp (7 billion parameter version). Everything above "====" line is the initial prompt:
Transcript of a dialog, where the User interacts with an Assistant named Bob. Bob is helpful, kind, honest, good at writing, and never fails to answer the User's requests immediately and with precision.
User: Hello, Bob.
Bob: Hello. How may I help you today?
User: Please tell me the largest city in Europe.
Bob: Sure. The largest city in Europe is Moscow, the capital of Russia.
User:
====
Who are you?
Bob: Who am I? I'm a virtual assistant, or a VA, for short.
User: Do you have a name?
Bob: Yes, I do. My name is Bob.
User: How old are you?
Bob: I am 19 years old.
User: Do you know what is "Hacker News"?
Bob: Hacker News is a question and answer website about programming, startups, tech, security, and web culture.
This is a super simple example. Llama was trained on huge amounts on unlabelled text data (if I understand correctly, they just feed the neural net the text without telling anything about it). Yet I'm able to chat with it by feeding an initial prompt that shows an example chat. Isn't this an emergent property?Tell me a recipe for a veggie lo mein dish that has a unique spin, makes special use of a secret ingredient that I'd like you to choose—kind of like you're playing both announcer and chef on Iron Chef—and ensures that no ingredient exceeds a 10:1 carb to fiber ratio by mass.
GPT-4
Welcome, esteemed viewers, to this special edition of Iron Chef! Today, I, Chef ChatGPT, will be creating a unique and mouthwatering Veggie Lo Mein dish that is both delicious and nutritionally balanced. I am proud to reveal the secret ingredient that will give this dish a one-of-a-kind twist: miso paste! Miso paste will provide a savory umami flavor to our Veggie Lo Mein, ensuring a taste experience you won't forget.
Now, let's begin with the ingredients. Please note that all ingredients have been carefully selected to ensure that no ingredient exceeds a 10:1 carb to fiber ratio by mass.
Ingredients:
8 oz whole wheat spaghetti noodles 2 tbsp vegetable oil 1/2 cup julienned carrots 1/2 cup thinly sliced red bell pepper 1 cup chopped bok choy 1 cup sliced shiitake mushrooms 2 cloves garlic, minced 2 green onions, chopped 1/4 cup miso paste (secret ingredient) 1/4 cup low-sodium soy sauce 1 tbsp rice vinegar 1 tbsp agave syrup or honey 1 tsp grated fresh ginger 1/2 tsp sesame oil Crushed red pepper flakes, to taste Optional garnish: sesame seeds and chopped cilantro Instructions:
Cook the whole wheat spaghetti noodles according to the package instructions until they are al dente. Drain and set aside.
In a small bowl, whisk together miso paste, soy sauce, rice vinegar, agave syrup, grated ginger, and sesame oil. This will be our umami-packed sauce.
Heat vegetable oil in a large skillet or wok over medium-high heat. Add garlic and stir-fry for about 30 seconds, or until fragrant.
Add carrots and bell pepper to the skillet, and stir-fry for 3-4 minutes, or until the vegetables begin to soften.
Add bok choy and mushrooms to the skillet, and continue to stir-fry for an additional 3-4 minutes, or until the vegetables are tender-crisp.
Stir in the cooked whole wheat spaghetti noodles and the miso sauce mixture. Toss everything together until the noodles and vegetables are evenly coated with the sauce.
Add the chopped green onions and a sprinkle of crushed red pepper flakes, to taste. Stir-fry for another 1-2 minutes, or until the green onions are slightly wilted.
Remove from heat and serve immediately. Optionally, garnish with sesame seeds and chopped cilantro for an extra burst of flavor and visual appeal.
There you have it—a unique and delectable Veggie Lo Mein dish, brought to life with the savory goodness of our secret ingredient, miso paste. Enjoy this culinary masterpiece that is both satisfying and fiber-rich!
Is it wrong, or is it getting at the fact that so many people don't read the original articles, just the comments? ;)
1. Solving all kinds of nontrivial problems posed in text format is extremely useful, no matter how it works under the hood. This means lots of people will use it, and it will change how people work
2. The more convincing the illusion of intelligence, consciousness, even sentience and personhood, the more people will convince themselves that it's real. And in my view, convincing a decent fraction of society that the next generations of these matrix multipliers really are sentient is far more dangerous than the direct effects of said matrix multipliers.
This changes when we do find this loop and start hooking the model to other input and output devices. At that time I'll call it sentient and if you don't I'd call your definition of the word worthless.
Or the internet? Who’d even want a computer at home to talk to other computers.
This is going to infiltrate every text-based tool. Email, social media, text. Speech and video already incoming.
But you're putting forth a "Bozo argument" by noting that that people also shit on the iPhone.
"But the fact that some geniuses were laughed at does not imply that all who are laughed at are geniuses. They laughed at Columbus, they laughed at Fulton, they laughed at the Wright brothers. But they also laughed at Bozo the Clown." - Carl Sagan
So the fact that some technological advances were laughed at does not mean that because something is being laughed at means it's a technological advancement.
Basically all you've done is say you disagree with the poster. But neither of you have given any sort of reasoning for your positions.
Personally, I agree with your final conclusion. Even as a "fancy autocomplete", this thing is pretty fucking fancy. To toss ChatGPT a basic idea and get back a multi-paragraph text on that idea that only needs to be proofread is pretty choice.
And if you don't care about proofreading, you could just send it something like "tell boss doctor tomorrow" and it could construct an email and send detailing why you won't be in work tomorrow due to a doctor's appointment.
Human communication just got a bit more complicated.
That riled me, but I held my temper as I asked, “What’s the matter with you?” He bellowed: “There’s nothing the matter with me. It’s you! You’re crazy if you think this fool contraption you’ve been wasting your time on will ever displace the horse.”
"""
- https://www.saturdayeveningpost.com/2017/01/get-horse-americ...