Women Are 41% More Likely to Experience Toxic Workplace Culture Than Men
sloanreview.mit.edu
sloanreview.mit.edu
Also for some reason I’m pretty sure that men are unlikely to backstab their former employer and instead silently move on, because they’re very likely not interested in having their future employer see them as a liability?
In the previous firm I worked as VPE I was forced to let an entire team go due to financial constraints, and the following reviews were somewhat shocking.
I'll never forget this one review: "everyone in the company are spineless yes-men". I know who it was because that particular person used a German wording that's unusual and only a single person in that team ever used (it was a woman I actually respected / still respect / for her experience and commitment, but the review was submitted as a male).
I guess I'm letting these reviews get too close to me, but that hurt to read. I even made sure that everyone in that team got a new job and I even spent an hour or so per employee in reference calls with their future employers... and that review was written after their new contracts were signed.
I know many women who have a very weird instinct to compete against the other women in their environment which is not exactly the same as how men compete. And the WAY women compete is NASTY.
I have met a lot of women who have said they greatly prefer to work with men over women and that some women have extremely aggressive instincts towards other women.
It’s something evolutionary along the lines of: “If there are few women and many men (typical in most tech environments), you are competing not only for male attention and prestige but it is also a zero sum game based on appearance so another woman is threatening across multiple attack vectors … if she is more attractive, the men will give her more resources. If she is more talented, she will get more attention etc.
I think it reminds me of Chinese dynasty politics where an emperor who has many wives - They all understand that it is a zero sum game and the children of the woman who gets the most attention will have the most resources. Go read about how Chinese imperial concubines handled one another. It was very, very, very bad.
It is incredibly sexist to talk about. But the effect is real. Humans have hormones. They don’t go away because we have been in an office for 50 years out of the last million years.
I personally think that the chemistry between men and women can be magical for work and create super productivity. I prefer to work with and for women. It’s because if I work with men everything becomes a sort of dominance contest and I personally don’t care for it.
Men are not perfect. Women aren’t either. As genders we have different ways of being awful and a good mix of both genders is likely a good way to balance this out.
12-hour shifts, sometimes very physically demanding, often highly stressful, and even when not stressful, often gross: cleaning up blood, puss, shit, etc. I've heard stories, both online as well as from medical folks I know, about the smells.
Small, single errors mean someone could die, and often from something as silly as writing down blood sugar levels incorrectly or with hard-to-read handwriting. CYA is SOP.
Barriers of entry are often low, and turnover + demand means that you're forced to make due with the staff you have not the staff you want -- which means Stacy the Room-Temperature-IQ Superstar now has more nursing duties than should be allowed.
After a while it's no wonder it turns toxic.
> But there's one demographic where women outearn men: people who are single, childless, and between the ages of 22 and 30.
> Within that universe, U.S. women earn 8 percent more than men, on average, according to a new report from the research firm Reach Advisors.
> Women in this group out-earn men by an even larger margin in some metro areas -- 17 percent in New York, 11 percent in San Francisco, and a high of 21 percent in Atlanta, to name a few.
This is driven by an elimination or reversal of the wage gap in many of the major metropolitan areas like NYC, LA, San Diego, Atlanta, DC ("some cities"). The study you're referring to [1] is for young men and women, regardless of whether they have children or not, for whom the gap is $0.93.
You might counter that this is due to women having higher post-secondary educational achievement levels. Which is to say, analyses of the pay gap need to be conditioned on other relevant demographic variables to say anything meaningful about discrimination.
Indeed. Once you control for all variables, for every $1 men make, women make $0.99 [2].
[0] https://www.wsj.com/articles/SB10001424052748704421104575463...
[1] https://www.pewresearch.org/fact-tank/2022/03/28/young-women...
[2] https://www.payscale.com/research-and-insights/gender-pay-ga...
Here's the reply:
------
In the discussion, various arguments have been presented surrounding the claim that women are 41% more likely to experience toxic workplace culture than men. Here, we break down the arguments into axioms and attempt to resolve them.
Argument 1: The data only shows that women are more likely to report toxic workplaces.
Axiom 1A: Women are more likely to report toxic workplaces than men.
Axiom 1B: Men are less likely to report toxic workplaces, possibly because they don't want to be perceived as a liability.
Argument 2: People typically report toxic workplaces when they are indeed toxic.
Axiom 2A: If a workplace is reported as toxic, it is likely actually toxic.
Argument 3: Men might react differently to toxic workplaces.
Axiom 3A: Men may take direct action against a former employer rather than report them on Glassdoor.
Argument 4: Women can also create toxic work environments.
Axiom 4A: Women can engage in aggressive and indirect behavior towards each other.
Axiom 4B: Evolutionary instincts and competition for resources, attention, and prestige might drive this behavior.
Argument 5: Cultural expectations shape how men and women respond to negative experiences.
Axiom 5A: Men are culturally expected to internalize negative experiences.
Axiom 5B: Women are culturally expected to attribute negative experiences to external factors.
To resolve these arguments, one could consider the following points:
1. Acknowledge that the data may reflect both actual toxic workplace experiences and differences in reporting rates between men and women. This would account for Axioms 1A, 1B, and 2A.
2. Recognize that both men and women can contribute to toxic work environments, as illustrated by Axioms 4A and 4B, but also acknowledge that they may respond differently to these experiences (Axioms 3A, 5A, and 5B).
3. Encourage open dialogue about toxic workplace culture, focusing on the experiences of both men and women, while considering the various factors that might influence their behavior and responses.
4. Promote research that investigates the different factors that contribute to toxic workplace culture, including individual, social, and cultural factors, as well as potential biases in the reporting of toxic workplaces.
By addressing these points, it is possible to gain a more comprehensive understanding of toxic workplace culture and the various factors that contribute to the differences in reported experiences between men and women.
------
As a fun exercise I made it generate a graphviz digraph from it: https://dreampuf.github.io/GraphvizOnline/#digraph%20Toxic_W... (prompt: Write a graphviz digraph based on your previous response.)
Though, thanks for acknowleding the use of AI here, one can never be sure nowadays :-)
And yet, here it is ;) This whole "asked GPT, here's what it said" spiel is getting old already.