I do actually perceive it, now that you draw attention to its existence, and can tell the difference, but you are correct: thin lines are aggravating to deal with!
And it's not just the red/green issue: it's also in distinguishing them from grey when the lines are thin.
Side issue: when I was a kid, my math teacher insisted on grading using those thin BIC red pens. The problem is that it was indistinguishable from my own writing (at a glance), and it took forever to find my mistakes that were "clearly marked" by the teacher. Thin red lines are pointless to me. I guess it's a good thing that I'm naturally good at math!
But the most accessible would be to use appropriate structure (together with appropriate semantic structure for those that cannot see at all) rather than appropriate coloring.
For example, when I saw the website in question, I did not notice the red or green text color at all. I did see the underline, though. I didn't know it's significance, however, because the key is at the bottom of the examples (5 rows of blocks of text examples) rather than the top. Oddly enough, in this particular instance, the green of the text looks more like a light grey, and I can see the red better than the green. Normally it's the other way around, but it might have something to do with the particular shades involved.
Importantly, there are different forms of red/green colorblindness. For some people, the colors are literally indistinguishable. They look exactly the same.
Mine is a form of reduced sensitivity. I can see it if it's a large area. E.g., if you're wearing a red shirt, then I know it's red, and it looks completely different from a green shirt. If it's just a thin line of red, though, then I might not pick up on it unless I concentrate. It just doesn't stand out when the lines are thin.
Fabric can be weird for me. Some fabrics cause issue because they will use red threads interspersed throughout the cloth in order to achieve a red/pinkish overtone, and I won't notice it at all (unless I really concentrate on it). It's because the red is coming from thin lines. I have to be careful with tweed, for example.
But again, that's just my experience.
I find increasing the brightness of the display helps, but it’s still a pain in the arse to distinguish the two when the lines are thin in this example.
Just for fun, can you make out the lettering in this image posted to the fediverse: https://mathstodon.xyz/@csk/109786201604517074
If you have deuteranopia or deuteranomaly, you should be able to just about make it out. With normal colour vision, on the other hand, it’s meant to be nearly impossible to see.
It's worse in mobile. It's several screens of example blocks before you get to the key.
The usual advice I’ve seen to avoid discriminating against people with reduced ability to differentiate color is “don’t use color distinctions alone for any purpose”. If you want to make things recognizable as different at a glance, and are inclined to use color for it – do that, but also use some other visual distinction. If its text, use a non-color stylistic distinction as well as color.
I’m certainly not against broader accessibility in any sense, I have had multiple sclerosis for 22-years, I was really more against using “quotes” to question a professional’s credibility for what seems like a fairly sensible choice.
.nope { text-decoration: line-through; }Could someone please link to a screenshot with some indication where to look? Thanks!
https://addons.mozilla.org/en-US/firefox/addon/let-s-get-col...
https://chrome.google.com/webstore/detail/lets-get-color-bli...
I used to use it myself until I got my colorlite glasses (although it still is practical to show to others how a website might be unreadable for me without the glasses)