The people who make the poor decisions absolutely took a hit. The Board and management of the bank all took a hit and lost their jobs.
I don’t see a big problem with depositors being made whole. The bonds that backed their deposits are fully intact.
The people who make the poor decisions absolutely took a hit. The Board and management of the bank all took a hit and lost their jobs.
I don’t see a big problem with depositors being made whole. The bonds that backed their deposits are fully intact.
Right after they cashed out significant amounts of SVB stocks.
0.5: 1
0.5: -1
And the bet is made of 80% deposits 20% capital.For the bank the profit before paying interest to depositors:
0.5 * 1 - 0.2 * 0.5 = 0.4
The bet is profit neutral but the banks profit comes from increasing the risk of triggering the insurance.For the insurer the cost is: 0.5 * -1* 0.8 = -0.4
If you want to run a ‘scam’ bank that makes money from looting the FDIC fund then having your capital going to zero sometimes is part of the cost of doing business. This is why it’s important for the insurer to try and control risk and insure there is enough capital so the loot equation does not work.
I see nothing there about "we will guarantee deposits of any amount over $250k."
The decision to guarantee SVB may wreak havoc on the financial system as banks feel comfortable continuing to make risky bets and thus attracting more customers, knowing that the fed will rescue the customer deposits that backed those bets.
Greg Becker isn't going to jail, and he isn't going to be financially ruined. There are thousands of people willing to fill the role of extracting money from the government. The trick is to not give into their attempts to bend the rules.