Of course it's well known by now, and even most modern economists have accepted this: the vast majority of people are not in fact wholly self interested. Though they are still rational in the sense that preferences are transitive.
"People should be free to do whatever they want except for these specific conditions which I consider important and do not negatively impact me very much but may negatively impact others a lot"
One thing universally agreed is that everyone should stay away of them at parties.
Between libertarians and Lisp people.. I don’t know man.. :)
(And, no, Libertarianism is not Anarchism. It is Libertarian Capitalism.)
Anarchism is a political philosophy and movement that is skeptical of all justifications for authority and seeks to abolish the institutions it claims maintain unnecessary coercion and hierarchy, typically including, though not necessarily limited to, governments, nation states,[1] and capitalism. Anarchism advocates for the replacement of the state with stateless societies or other forms of free associations. As a historically left-wing movement, usually placed on the farthest left of the political spectrum, it is usually described alongside communalism and libertarian Marxism as the libertarian wing (libertarian socialism) of the socialist movement.
Libertarianism of any stripe has this same bootstrap problem: if I’m not free to redefine words, then I’m not free.