2024 GMC Hummer EV SUV Uses Enormous Battery to Charge Other Electric Cars
thedrive.com
thedrive.com
That’s because for 2024 the boxy off-roaders can now charge other EVs up to 6 kW with a new, onboard 19.2-kWh Level 2 charger. (Earlier Hummer EV Pickups can charge up to 11.5 kW.)
Has my head spinning trying to make sense of it all. It can charge at "up to 6 kW" I guess, that's the max power rating of the charger connection, then but missing that "at" makes it hard for me to parse. Not a native speaker, though.
Then it becomes even harder, why does the charger have a rating in kWh, which is an amount of energy? Is that amount somehow reserved in the battery, so after sharing 19.2 kWh, it turns off? That sounds ... weirdly non-helpful.
Finally: if earlier versions of the vehicle already had a charger but at a lower capacity/power/whatever, then this functionality isn't actually new?
Edit: also missed a word, oopsie.
It's even more confusing when they mention older vehicles charging at 11.5kW. All that being said, I'm not sure what utility is really being served by having the charger? I guess as a recovery method for stranded vehicles? Is it just a grid-power inverter?
I once had legal find and replace all technically precise usage of power to energy in some marketing copy because they felt like we were flip flopping words too much to add flavor to our text. Sure, I'm guilty of that, but...really?
I will stop your head spinning.
They added support for vehicle to load (V2L). It can output up to 6 kW. The onboard charger is also now faster and can accept up to 19.2 kW AC input as opposed to the previous 11.5 kW.
Why should a person that weight about 80kg on average drag along with them a 4000 kg weight just to get around? That is easily 50 times their own weight.
And how does a civilization which claims to be concerned about damage to the environment caused by carbon dioxide, and toxic mining entertain such depraved behaviour if they truly believe that the world is coming to an end on account of environmental damage?
Then the same person moans that fuel costs are too high.
Am I missing something here?
I actually am less concerned about the environmental damage that this EV would cause than I am about the precedent ("now that you're not limited by gas prices, you can get a giant truck!!") and the inevitable rise in pedestrian and bike deaths (and probably car deaths as well, as how many sedans are going to fare well against a car accident with this thing?).
How much of the energy used in the manufacturing of this vehicle and its batteries comes from "clean" sources?
So called SUVs are no good for the environment and cities, EV or not.
As someone who walks/rides a bike whenever I can, I do not want even more upward pressure on vehicle sizes.
edit:typo
EDIT: my link was broken. But look it up: these trucks now have front-facing cameras so you can see what's right in front of you.
You're wrong. Smaller models are being phased in:
https://www.autocar.co.uk/car-news/new-cars/volkswagen-confi...
https://www.autocar.co.uk/car-news/new-cars/volkswagen-id-2a...
I hope you're right that I'm wrong though.
6kW AC is enough for a camping or as a backup power for a house, but for charging other EVs it's painfully slow. With a DC charger Hummer can charge literally 50 times faster than this.
Don't they weigh more than a small car?
https://www.caranddriver.com/news/a39049358/2022-gmc-hummer-...
The Ioniq 5 weights 2.1 tons, has a 56 kWh battery, gets 220 miles, and takes 264 Wh to go one mile.