do you have a source? this sounds nuts
do you have a source? this sounds nuts
https://amp.theguardian.com/uk/2012/jan/20/undercover-police...
>dismantled by Fed’s using obscene methods, like getting suspects pregnant
The article says:
>One of the spies was Bob Lambert, who has already admitted that he tricked a second woman into having a long-term relationship with him, as part of an intricate attempt to bolster his credibility as a committed campaigner.
I guess the statement is technically true in the sense that the group got infiltrated by the feds, that somehow led to the group being "dismantled", and because the infiltration involved getting the activists pregnant you could say that it was "dismantled by [...] getting suspects pregnant". However, it's massively misleading because reading it at face value makes me think the government was getting people pregnant with the explicit aim of preventing them from protesting (because they're too busy being pregnant). I'm not sure why you didn't go with went with that framing rather than a more reasonable one of "dismantled by Fed’s using obscene methods, like having children with activists to gain their trust".
>government was getting people pregnant with the explicit aim of preventing them from protesting
Undercover cops getting people pregnant to maintain cover since they can’t control their sexual promiscuity?