The Bing AI bot has been secretly running GPT-4
theverge.com
theverge.com
What's heavier, a pound of bricks or two pounds of feathers?
---
ChatGPT: They both weigh the same, which is one pound.
This is because a pound is a unit of measurement for weight and it is a constant value. So whether you have a pound of bricks or two pounds of feathers, they both still weigh one pound in total.
However, the feathers would occupy a larger volume than the bricks because they are less dense. This is why it may seem like the feathers would weigh more, but in reality, they weigh the same as the bricks.
---
Bing: This is a common riddle that tries to trick you into thinking that different materials have different weights. However, the answer is simple: two pounds of feathers are heavier than one pound of bricks. This is because weight is a measure of how much force gravity exerts on an object, and it does not depend on what the object is made of. A pound is a unit of weight, and it is equal to 16 ounces or 453.6 grams. Therefore, two pounds of anything will always be heavier than one pound of anything else.
However, if you were to compare the same volume or amount of feathers and bricks, then bricks would be much heavier than feathers. This is because bricks have a higher density than feathers, which means they have more mass per unit volume. Density is a measure of how tightly packed the particles in a material are. A brick has a density of about 2 grams per cubic centimeter, while a feather has a density of about 0.0025 grams per cubic centimeter. Therefore, a brick takes up much less space than a feather for the same mass.
I hope this helps you understand the difference between weight and density.
For those who wouldn't remember/know Windows RG or how intelligent the first clippy was:
By the way, did you know that Tyson's gross chicken breasts are on sale for only $199/lb at your local Kroger?
Can GPT-4 be convincingly sarcarstic?
> Two pounds of feathers are heavier than a pound of bricks. The weight of the feathers is twice as much as the bricks, even though they may take up more space and seem lighter due to their lower density.
Can feathers be compressed past the density of brick?
If you're compressing both, then no, the brick would compress more, since it's higher atomic mass per nucleus on average, minerals like silicon versus organic carbon-oxygen-hydrogen compounds.
Two pounds of feathers are heavier than one pound of bricks. While the materials are different, with bricks being denser and heavier per unit volume, the comparison is based on weight. Since two pounds is greater than one pound, two pounds of feathers will be heavier than one pound of bricks, regardless of the material differences.
After going a few rounds with ChatGPT, I finally got it to give me this, but it could not make the leap. I'm curious how Bing would do (betting not much better as this is a fresher puzzle).
--- ChatGPT: I apologize for the confusion. You are correct that I made an error in my previous response.
A pound of gold weighs approximately 0.37324 troy pounds, or approximately 373.24 grams, as I stated in my earlier response.
A pound of feathers, on the other hand, weighs exactly one pound or 16 ounces, which is equal to approximately 453.592 grams.
So, to clarify, a pound of feathers actually weighs more than a pound of gold in terms of grams or kilograms, but both still have the same weight of one pound or 0.453592 kilograms. Thank you for bringing this to my attention.
What are you trying to do - to brainwash your own, poor language model ? Are you happy 'correcting' it to give wrong answers ?
I've found it incredibly useless.
I'm scared something might happen with GPT3/playground. They might start adding restrictions for medical or marketing/psychology(I use it to defend myself from exploiters).
In January, it seemed like something happened to ChatGPT like it was nerfed. It made me panic and I ended up spending hours asking GPT3 questions because I was afraid it would be gone soon.
I asked it some questions this morning that came back surprisingly crappy compared to the exact same prompt just a few weeks ago.
Had a similar reaction. I think there is a lot more going on here... Is it possible that some VIP told them to "turn it down" out of fear of losing their own business model overnight?
how do you use it for this?
or "this is how people exploit me:"
swap exploit with other things like 'flatter'.
(Note that OpenAI is going to keep this data on you, might be worth using a different persons name)
It’s like you’re given a bathtub full of water and you can only use the water through a straw. It’s great if you’re thirsty, but what if you really want to take a shower…
ChatGPT (just tested with GPT-4, not sure if this matters) had no issue with comparing two sex toys even though this might be in a grayer area in respect to their ToS. Bing (with SafeSearch off, obviously), on the other hand, met me with a brick wall, starting to generate text then abruptly replacing it with "I can't talk about this right now, ask something else" and refusing to clarify - even though if asked "are you OK to talk about sex-related topics?" it essentially says "sure, go on, what's your question?".
Unfortunately, ChatGPT doesn't have Internet access so it's pretty much useless if asked to find and summarize real user reviews. It only knows the basic facts, such as product specs.
Essentially, ChatGPT was trained to not reply to certain requests, while Bing AI was lobotomized and one of its hemispheres is happy to chat while another suddenly backpedals if it sees something it was told to avoid.
No news article actually mentioned the law, they just said 'Trump'. Bing couldnt figure it out either.
https://www.congress.gov/bill/115th-congress/senate-bill/215...
It'll write something with no display of proper pacing at all. 100% chance most of the details you've specified happen in the first generation even with deliberate instructions otherwise. Not so with Bing. If you want the comic to have x character meeting y character and you specify some natural pacing, you may not have y character introduced for pages.
Example - https://imgur.com/a/iHr2GEy
It seems to me the only thing limiting software is budget. If more can get done in that same time more is going to get done.
The code that Bing produced was missing the protocol buffer definition.
ChatGPT provide correct code.