Hacker News Reader

Comment by aliljet | Hacker News Reader

I think this is a clever way for OpenAI to trade access to GPT-4 and simultaneously decrease their own intellectual burden for their for-profit models. Here's the offending parts of the README.md:

"For a limited time, we will be granting GPT-4 access to those who contribute high quality evals. Please follow the instructions mentioned above and note that spam or low quality submissions will be ignored!"

View on HN

I'm surprised they would give it out when millions, if not billions are potentially at stake and following the LLaMA leak

Access to the inference API, not model code or weights.

Are you sure? API access is already given to everyone I think

Edit: We have access through ChatGPT+, not the API. Got confused there.

No, its on waitlist.

to be fair, with alpaca, access to API is even dangerous

how so??

There wasn't a leak. You don't need to make it sound like we're in a cyberpunk RPG.

what are you talking about? The LLaMA weights leaked from someone on 4chan.

Facebook released them with essentially zero effort to stop anyone from resharing them. I think they let anyone with a .edu email get them. It wasn't hacked or anything.

But they still didn't publish it into the _public_, like a public download link on their GitHub repo, so it's still a leak.

Can we not have semantic arguments on HN? You know what I meant.

Facebook is still directly hosting the model, if they wanted to stop people from downloading it then it wouldn't be on their public CDN.

Reply on news.ycombinator.com