I thought the reason people were pissed at the 2008 bailouts because the actual too-big-to-fail corporations (less Lehman and WaMu) were enabled to continue existing, with their shareholders still owning part of the corporations.
Here it's only the depositors who are being made whole.
Struggling to take you in good faith, you're wrong either way. Working people were pissed about the 2008 bailout because they were left empty-handed while Wall Street banks and CEOs got bailed out. Your comparison falls flat because there are no working people involved in the SVB situation.
> Your comparison falls flat because there are no working people involved in the SVB situation.
Sure there are plenty of people dependent on SVB deposits for their paychecks. And it sucks to be an SVB employee. But the shareholders are effectively wiped out, unless and until SVB's assets are eventually sold for more than its liabilities.
I'm annoyed at the support for Carnival and other cruise lines during the early days of the COVID pandemic. I even sent an email (which was answered) to the local Fed branch saying that they should backstop consumer credit card debt the way they were backstopping corporate loans.
Shareholder bailouts are the worst but there are negative consequences to all cases.