I notice several articles and threads derailing into conflations of semantic arguments around what a bailout is with specifics of the topic.
This is a trend (and, I suspect, tactic) on other topics and it only serves polarization. Try to not fall into this trap. It can be possible to call it out in a way which does not further derail the conversation.
(Saying it's a trend does not mean it's merely a recent thing BTW)
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Weasel_word
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Equivocation
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Essentially_contested_concept
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Persuasive_definition
Whether the statement "this is a bailout" is true or not is actually irrelevant.