The rationale presented alongside the urging to pull out doesn’t have to be fabricated, just hypothetical. That the risk become real as a consequence of being suggested is potentially interesting, but ya know.
The rationale presented alongside the urging to pull out doesn’t have to be fabricated, just hypothetical. That the risk become real as a consequence of being suggested is potentially interesting, but ya know.
Isn't any identification of a run risk hypothetical? I think the question is whether it was a reasonable concern or not. If it was a reasonable concern, then the run is simply rational behavior for an uncoordinated group. If it was not a reasonable concern, then the run was irrational and panic driven. My issue with it being an unreasonable concern is that I haven't seen anyone claim this explicitly or provide a rationale. If anyone has a rationale for how it was an unreasonable concern, I am interested..
Take a deposit from another bank to offset the deposits being withdrawn. Through funds or repo. If it was a short term funding issue, this is normal (at a system level, interbank lending always balances, just an accounting identity). But that wasn't done. Whether that's because other banks were unwilling to step in may be interesting to see.
There was an easy mechanism for that - simply purchase the shares SVB was offering.
But no, community that claims they are going to save the world couldn’t exercise enough long-term thinking to even save their piggy bank.
There should be no bailout by the Fed. This community has enough resources. If they can think long term and act together, they’ll reorganize themselves in a responsible way. If they can’t, then they deserve to fail financially and they’ll have less resources to control.
It wasn't done because the assets SVB had at current market values was worth less than their liabilities. You'd be crazy to lend money to SVB.
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Interbank_lending_market
But people weren't withdrawing because of a funny Reddit meme; they were withdrawing because SVB was underwater.
And creditors don't like underwater debtors