This is about as strong as a signal they could put out to stop a possible run.
This is about as strong as a signal they could put out to stop a possible run.
Or a desperation signal, which might actually trigger a run. Like what happened with SVB.
The minute the CEO of SVB tried to reassure investors and told them everything would be ok if they just kept their deposits with them, immediately everyone started withdrawing.
Are the “safe” banks all putting out statements about the strength of their financials? They probably don’t feel like they really need to say anything. They feel safe, and that’s what keeps them safe. The moment they panic, their clients panic.
I guess we’ll see what happens.
(https://www.bloomberg.com/opinion/articles/2020-03-12/the-bu... the section is called "thirty minutes")
This is one way in which the current crisis is self-limiting. It was brought about because SVB took lots of deposits when rates were low and invested them when bond prices were high, and now they don't have liquidity without taking a loss. But if banks take lots of deposits now and invest them when bond prices are low, their average cost goes down and it's much easier for them to satisfy customer withdrawals without taking large losses.
It becomes a crisis again if all the banks start failing at once, because then the likely consumer behavior is a flight to hard cash or crypto rather than another bank.