It's perhaps unfortunate that the high-profile one is made by a company with AI in the name. This is confusing media, and by extension, non-techies into into using the word "intelligent".
Sure these models pass a Turing test, and they write incredibly well, but they're not intelligent. They're basically a search engine with good grammer.
As humans we consider well-spokeness as a proxy for intelligence. How we mock those who speak broken English - they are clearly not intelligent. By contrast the well spoken person is clearly smart (even if what he says is bullshit to those who actually know.)
So here is a computer that speaks with excellent grammer. Clearly it is intelligent. Clearly it is out to rule the world.
The truth alas is less exotic. By scraping a zillion Web pages, and reading a zillion twitter feeds, it merely parrots what has already been written. Computers used to be good at math (once a sign of intelligence) now they are good at language as well.
Is this useful? Sure. There are lots of places where good writing is important. Is it the next wave of computing? It's too early to tell. I have my doubts, but that I'd likely somewhat fueled by the many waves I've seen on the horizon that were ripples when they got to shore.
I've played around with ChatGPT a fair bit. My feeling is that I can imagine it for high school essays or low-effort corporate BS.
It might also be useful for someone looking at a blank sheet of paper who really struggles with that. I can even imagine a degree of generating a template for certain types of articles. OTOH, editing from an an existing article can actually be harder and produce lower-quality output than starting at said blank sheet of paper.
Don’t know the answer, but as with software/internet in general we need to at least watch out for false sense of progress.
I personally hope the next big wave will be somewhere along the IoT line and physical automation, agri-tech, health-tech, where software transcends the virtual and finally start automating the physical.