Hacker News Reader

Comment by syzarian | Hacker News Reader

I’m a college teacher in a union. I don’t know much about what happens in k-12 but I do know my union is not responsible for our low pay in my system. What evidence do you have for your claim?

Police unions are far more powerful that public k-12 teacher unions.

View on HN

I do not know what the other poster is referring to, but things like this are often indirect consequences. The unions may not be literally, directly suppressing wages, but their other policies may be strongly causing it.

Across history, trying to "do good" by force/law/policy has caused a lot of negative side effects.

In Washington the teachers union is the most powerful special interest group bar none

Citation?

Don't know anyone elected in WA state without the teachers' union endorsement.

The police, on the other hand, got drastically defunded.

In Washington, it is illegal for public school teachers to strike:

https://www.peninsuladailynews.com/news/public-employee-stri...

Yet they strike regularly with complete impunity. That's power.

In my system what happens is a contract is negotiated for a period of time. During this period of time we agree to not strike. Once the contract ends we can strike. In 20 years in my system I have never experienced a situation in which a new contract was negotiated before the old contract ended. While we negotiate for a new contract, and after the old contract has expired, we can strike. Don’t know if things are different in Washington but I doubt there is a blanket ban, in all possible circumstances, on striking.

> Police unions are far more powerful that public k-12 teacher unions.

There are about 5 teachers per police officer, so teachers unions should typically be much stronger than police unions.

Sure, but a police officer has much (much) more power than 5 teachers. I can't remember the last time teachers benefited from qualified immunity or civil forfeiture.

I have never heard people chant "Defund the schools" though, so it seems like teachers has much more political support and power overall. Qualified immunity isn't thanks to police unions, the supreme court decided that because they thought that policemen shouldn't risk go to jail just for doing their job, the police union didn't seem to have much involvement.

They don’t chant “defund schools”. Instead the slogan is “school choice”. There has been a campaign for the last 50 years to erode public education.

Are there no teachers in private schools?

We aren’t talking about private schools. We are talking about whether or not there is a chant similar to “defund the police” for public schools. The answer is yes there is.

I have never heard people chant "Defund the schools" though

Sounds like you don't live in a red state.

https://newrepublic.com/article/163817/desantis-republicans-...

https://www.azcentral.com/story/opinion/op-ed/elviadiaz/2021...

https://www.thenation.com/article/society/gop-populist-defun...

https://www.thedailybeast.com/betsy-devos-and-the-gops-plan-...

https://www.salon.com/2022/07/01/schools-out-forever-arizona...

https://www.texasobserver.org/disrupt-deplete-destroy/

> I have never heard people chant “Defund the schools”

Hah! That says more about what you listen to than what’s being said. People have been fighting loudly to pull money out of public schools for longer than most people on this site have been alive. It provided more election debate and more massive ad and PR campaigns through the 80’s and 90’s than any police reform politic could dream of, and it continues to be a major part of today’s more crowded debate.

To be fair, police kill a lot more people than teachers do.

Power as it pertains to a union is about their ability to negotiate working conditions, pay, and worker protections. I know of no large group of public employees with better worker protections.

What worker protection has the police union negotiated that the teachers union failed to get? Qualified immunity isn't due to the unions, and there is no reason to give it to teachers since teachers aren't required to be violent to do their job. If teachers were required to be violent then they would have qualified immunity as well.

Police hold municipalities hostage if they don’t get their way in terms of protection from prosecution for violating peoples’ civil rights and for exerting nonjudicial punishments. In my city a councilman complained about police brutality and the police purposefully responded to non violent 911 calls hours after they were made. When they would show up they would tell people to thank their councilman for the delay. Police commit more domestic violence on average and get prosecuted for this violence at a much lower rate than non police. In some municipalities police are effectively a gang.

My police union's president has been fired from the force 3 times because he literally abused people, including children at the school he was supposed to be protecting, and each time the union sued and got him reinstated. Meanwhile teachers are fired regularly.

Reply on news.ycombinator.com