And it was going so well. The first sentence has no relation at all to the second.
Knowing you have a finite life doesn't make you do any less good, I'd argue it does the opposite. Religious or not, you can consider your values. sigh
And it was going so well. The first sentence has no relation at all to the second.
Knowing you have a finite life doesn't make you do any less good, I'd argue it does the opposite. Religious or not, you can consider your values. sigh
I figured people would misread that section. I rewrote a couple of times, but in all honesty people see the word "religion" and then the conversation is over, as you have demonstrated. The problem is that the driver of religion -- creatively speculating on the unknown -- is a completely different thing than the application of these common myths in some kind of social structure. But the word has both meanings.
Sorry about that. I'll think about how to word it better.
EDIT: Reworded it a bit to try to clear it up.
The existentialists argue that any formal, self-consistent religious structure is necessarily broken -- God is dead -- not that the essence of religion, finding meaning by artistically living an authentic life, doesn't work.
That cuts to the chase, but due to its structure, it can be easy to misread.
[Edit: grammar]
"unquestioningly believing what you've been told" - how about that?