Hacker News Reader

Comment by wanderingstan | Hacker News Reader

Whenever they say a UI is “simplified”, we now all know that it means features for serious users have been eliminated.

Google Drive was already getting maddeningly unusable. E.G., you can search for a file but then it’s nie impossible to find what folder it’s in. I’ve begun migrating all my remote file storage to iCloud, and know that gmail is probably next.

View on HN

This isn't meant to be a dig at you, but iCloud seems like an interesting choice for someone who cares about visible folder structures, given that Apple led the pack on hiding files and folders from their users. I'd be curious to know whether you evaluated a bunch of alternatives or settled on iCloud because you already had an account and it was just an easy choice.

Disclaimer: I would definitely say I have a personal bias against Apple.

With iCloud Drive, you can view your files in the normal finder, including the folder structure. You can do so in Windows explorer too, if you install iCloud in Windows.

The only thing keeping me from moving over to iCloud is the linux support. I can use Google drive using rclone. I wish I could mount iCloud Drive in Linux as well.

Which one doesn't support syncing locally?

> With iCloud Drive, you can view your files in the normal finder, including the folder structure.

Is that any different from https://www.google.com/drive/download/, which mounts the files under /Volumes/GoogleDrive?

You search for the file, and either:

1. Right-click + choose "show file location" to open the folder, or

2. Left-click on the file and look at the breadcrumb trail at the bottom of the window

Not only is it not impossible, but I don't know how it could be any more straightforward.

I don’t have time now, but I believe this is not possible on mobile, which was why I needed at the time.

You click the 3 dot menu, and then 'Details', which also gives you a direct link to the folder

Genuine question: do you really need to put things in folders in google drive given how good their search engine is?

This can be a way to lock users in, as it’s probably more painful to migrate thousands of unorganized files to a new platform.

It’s basically lock-in through search performance.

If you're looking for a file, or a bunch of files, but you only remember the name of a different file in the directory... then absolutely, yes.

This is my usual case. I recall it have some snippet that I’ll use as a “key” to find the larger project it was part of.

I don't use Google Drive, but I can tell you that, for my use case, folders are useful for keeping notes, spreadsheets, and other resources for each project separate from each other. Search and Stars won't be adequate replacement for folders.

I’ve got quarterly reports going back years with a folder for each quarter. The file contents are so similar that searching for a specific quarter would just bring them all up. Much quicker to drill down by folder.

Not the same person, but for me, it's vital. I use my filesystem like a librarian uses a catalog, I don't want to lose that metadata and lump all my files in the same bag but with tags and searches. I know exactly where everything is.

I mean, give me directory tree, and a search field with tags, and I'm much more likely to find what I need faster with the former.

If you mount it on your regular machine then it's kind of necessary.

Reply on news.ycombinator.com