How would an adjustable rate mortgage be the best choice for consumers in that situation?
I got an initial mortgage at 5.625%, refi’d to 3.875%, then again to some ~3% 15-year. I never seriously considered an ARM (and now wish I'd refi'd a third time back to a fresh 30-year fixed just to keep using that cheap money for longer).
When 30-year FRM rates are 3%, though, take the fixed.
They're a known-unknown. Well-defined risk can be priced in. Black swans / unknown-unknowns can't.
“Priced in” has a very specific meaning, it’s not a generic term for being aware that something might happen.
Once fixed rates got down to the 3-4% range, that seemed to no longer hold and I was frequently offered fixed-rate jumbo mortgages at rates slightly lower than adjustables (I have no idea why they even bothered to quote an adjustable at that point).
If you could get a 10/1 cheaper than a fixed-30 and were pretty sure you'd be moving in 7 years, that's why someone would take out an ARM. (Or, if they could qualify for the ARM but not the fixed-rate payment.)
https://fred.stlouisfed.org/series/MORTGAGE30US
https://fred.stlouisfed.org/series/MORTGAGE5US
You do see a sharp reduction in ARM mortgages as a share of total with the interest rate reductions post 2008: https://i2.wp.com/financialsamurai.com/wp-content/uploads/20...