To cut the title here some slack, it is the title of the essay :)
In this case the original title is arguably both, but on the other hand (1) it's literally a description of the content, which is fascinating; and (2) the 'd' in 'Rodgers' is a decisive if subtle cue to the difference.
It's a borderline call, but I think in this case the title is tasteful and crafted enough to not be garden-variety clickbait and we should keep it.
Elitism. Snobbery. Ugh.
What specifically could HN do differently to be less snobby?
I didn't mean to imply that you were infected by it! I just knew we would have a breakout somewhere.