Don't have a clear picture of what "better" mean? That's also simple. Look at what people were eating 100 years ago, and how much physical activity they were doing then.
Or, look at other countries across the world today.
> British Daily Ration, 1914:
>
> 1 1/4 lb fresh or frozen meat, or 1 lb preserved or salt meat;
> 1 1/4 lb bread, or 1 lb biscuit or flour;
> 4 oz. bacon;
> 3 oz. cheese;
> 5/8 oz. tea;
> 4 oz. jam;
> 3 oz. sugar;
> 1/2 oz salt;
> 1/36 oz. pepper;
> 1/20 oz. mustard;
> 8 oz. fresh or 2 oz. dried vegetables;
> 1/10 gill lime juice if fresh vegetables not issued;
> 1/2 gill rum;
> not exceeding 2 oz. tobacco per week.
But let's take it at face value, these rations are calculated for target activity level. Any idea of what that is? Cause I'm pretty confident that it's higher than the sedentary North American lifestyle.
Do you mean fructose? PUFAs? Be specific. What do I eat/avoid?
Look at what they eat and how active they are in their daily lives, and then do that.
I’m not saying that there is only 1 answer for what this looks like, I’m happy to say that there are countless viable options that deal with the obesity and this is demonstrably true since these were not problems in the past.
Doesn't seem like a productive comment.
There are certainly countless viable options, but I've yet to see someone suggest one that doesn't require me moving to another continent to become a physical laborer.