The same can be said about money moved to the West, just with a different risk profile. As the Russian situation has shown, your property can be creatively taken away if your country of origin pisses off the US too much.
I don’t think you’d be able to name a single case that isn’t T like that.
Just look at the length of the list with sanctioned persons. Are you seriously saying that all of them have "direct ties to and prop up Putin"?
2) Yandex was understandably cautious in the light of the new Russian laws, which effectively put a censorship net on coverage of the war.
3) Are you saying that Volozh should have followed the unspoken Western rules in operation of a business in Russia (read: he should've acted to please the West as much as he can, anticipating its demands) or risk loosing access to all his property in the West without any warning? And you think the Chinese will not see it as a potential risk?
He was sanctioned by the EU, no the US.
1) https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Arkady_Volozh
2) https://www.reuters.com/technology/yandex-ceo-volozh-resigns...
https://daily.jstor.org/communist-party-of-china/
> Regulations require that all state-owned enterprises and private companies operate party branches, and even some foreign-owned companies like Walmart have them. Internally, the organization can serve as a fertile networking ground. And for entrepreneurs, party membership often brings better relations with local government officials.