Tesla had reputedly activated his energy transmitter at Wardencliff, focused on Peary's location. If you draw that line (Wardencliff to Peary's expedition location) and double it, you have the Tunguska forest.
Tesla had reputedly activated his energy transmitter at Wardencliff, focused on Peary's location. If you draw that line (Wardencliff to Peary's expedition location) and double it, you have the Tunguska forest.
"Tesla said his transmitter could produce 100 million volts of pressure and currents up to 1000 amperes, with experimental power levels of billion or tens of billions of watts.(18) If that amount of power were released in 'an incomparably small interval of time,'(19) the energy would be equal to the explosion of millions of tons of TNT, that is, a multi-megaton explosion. Such a transmitter would be capable of projecting the force of a nuclear warhead by radio."
"18. Tesla, Nikola, New York Times, 'How to Signal Mars,' May 23, 1909, pg. 10. He claims to have sent 'a current around the globe' on the order of '15,000,000' horsepower or 11 billion watts."
"19. Secor, H. Winfield, 'The Tesla High Frequency Oscillator,' The Electrical Experimenter, March 1916, pg. 615."
[0] https://web.archive.org/web/20040203060110/http://www.frank....
I expect some of our most brilliant minds today may end up with a similar retrospective.
Where did this power come from?
> If that amount of power were released in 'an incomparably small interval of time,'(19) the energy would be equal to the explosion of millions of tons of TNT, that is, a multi-megaton explosion.
Err what?
Watts is a measure of 'rate' not total energy. The smaller the unit of time the less the total energy transferred.
1 megaton of TNT is equivalent to 1.162 trillion watt hours. If you could generate and transmit 1 billion watts of energy, you would need to do this for 48 days and 10 hours before you've released the equivalent of a single megaton.
Or, flipped around, 1 gigawatt over say 0.1s is only ~23.9 kilograms of TNT. A decent amount of energy, but nothing on the order of Tunguska.
(60000000000 MJ) / (1000000000 watts) = 2 years
(69.4 days if you have 10 billion watts)
Going the other way around, releasing that energy in 0.1 seconds requires: (60000000000 MJ) / (0.1 seconds) = 6E17 Watts
or almost 60 million times more energy than what Tesla himself claimed he could do.Your source, Oliver Nichelson, seems to have done the wrong math (or perhaps I did?). 1 megaton of TNT is 4.184E15 J
(4.18400E15 joules) / (1 000 000 000 watts) = 48.4 days
(4.8 days if you have 10 billion watts)
48 days is not an "incomparably small interval of time". And if released in 0.1 seconds: (4.18400E15 joules) / (0.1 s) = 4.1E16 Watts
or about 4 million times more powerful than what Tesla claimed he could do.Also, it doesn't seem like Nichelson is clear about the difference between power and energy.
Power is the energy transferred or converted per unit time. That's why it's measured in watts = Joules/s or the equivalent in other systems.
Energy is just the Joule part of that term. The phrase 'If that amount of power were released in 'an incomparably small interval of time,' is imprecise. It should be 'that amount of energy', which would then give the needed J/s for power. But there's no reference to what that amount of energy was.
Thing is, the power supply was already given, as "tens of billions of watts". You can't release tens of billions of watts - J/s - in an incomparably small interval of time because that's meaningless - power isn't measured in J/s/s.
What you can do is release tens of billions of energy in an incomparably small interval of time. But it would take time - months or even years - to build up that energy with only a 1-10 GW power supply.
The essay you link to doesn't describe how that energy is stored before release. At best is says "build up electric fields", but it still takes days to get that much energy in the first place.
Since the math doesn't work out, since the author seems to be confused between power and energy, and since there's no explanation of how Telsa could have generated 60000000000 MJ of energy, much less release it in a split second, I think it's appropriate to discount the thesis of that essay.
> In 1946, for instance, science-fiction writer Alexander Kazantsev explained the puzzling scene by positing a scenario in which an alien spacecraft had exploded in the atmosphere.
Maybe Tesla shot down a UFO, and it self-destructed to prevent their technology from falling into our hands.
In a way, his mind was that weapon. And it's a good thing, too. Imagine someone else with that kind of knowledge.
/s
The entire tesla arc never happened, the whole thing was an elaborate con. "but " you exclaim, "we saw the machine, the hats, the trip to america", to which I reply this is a case of second person narrative the only source for this information is the diary(which the movie dutifully animates) and the diary was planted, the diary was the con.
The release of a subsequent film with the same actor sadly disproved it.
And of course Nikola Tesla. Which probably makes Edison The Master. There's definitely an AU fan fiction in there somewhere, which in its Golden Age (electropunk?) Lovecraft-noir incorporates "Edison's Conquest of Mars[0]," an influential but otherwise garbage sequel to H.G. Wells' War of the Worlds. Sorry, what was I.. oh yeah. Tunguska. Obviously Tesla accidentally reversed the polarity of the neutron flow.
[0]https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Edison%27s_Conquest_of_Mars
OK, sure, fine... but then who was The Rani??
In fact, he likely did not make it. He just possesed enough knowledge to imagine such a weapon possible in theory.
There's a reason why I said knowledge about a weapon.
[0] I would say that the "death ray" doesn't count, because he's not the first to come up with it. The teleforce is not a weapon of mass destruction.
Electricity simply doesn't provide a practical mass destructive capacity in the way that, say, the strong nuclear force does. However, from the breakneck rate of electrical technology from the 1890s onwards, you could see why an extrapolation of those capabilities could make it plausible that it could eventually get there.
There's been plenty of times in history something has been lost or buried due to the death of the creator or societal / political pressures.
Consider the EV1 and the legal fight against California's Zero Emissions legislation, some 20 years before Tesla Motors would shake things up.
So what? Perpetual motion machines, and a lot of other junk that never could work, have also been patented both before and since. Not only Einstein but also a lot of idiots have worked in patent offices around the world.
Until there is some proof that Tesla possesed an “advanced way to cause mass destruction” there is nothing but doubt about that.