No, the workers have generated billions, not him. But he and his ilk damage the society by pressuring the company mgmt to perform layoffs and cut costs until shit hits the fan. Have you not heard of the struggles of workrs at one of "his" companies regarding the sick leave, have you not heard of the East Palestine, Ohio disaster (I know - not his company, but may have been as well), precision-scheduled railroading and how it completely messes up the lifes of the workforce affected. Did you sleep over the increasing push for RTO so the billionaire class could keep the value of "their" real-estate? The lives of people and environmental impact be damned! The letter of that investor to Google CEO, asking for even more layoffs, commending him for a well-done round one? Finally, have you been living under the rock and have not heard the steady talk of "incoming recession", well for more than 12 months now, the Fed's Powell openly calling for higher unemployment rates and lower salaries. That CNBC talking-head from a few months ago, saying effectively, people still had too much money in their savings accounts? One gets an impression they seem to really, really want to spark the next recession. Are you perhaps too young to remember the credit crunch of 2008? Hint - do a bit of research on Uncle Warrens wise investment decisions leading up to that crisis. Well yes now, one does wonder, how the hell did the likes of WB exactly cause economic damage to the society?

The parent poster is making the incorrect assumption that wealth and investment is inherently bad for society.