Hacker News Reader

My sense it is cultural. If there's no consequence for breaking stuff then stuff gets broken. Other languages have a stronger culture of shame from breaking stuff.

View on HN

Thinking we need to shame our colleagues more is a really bad take. You can like your obscure programming language for all sorts of reasons, but if they go around shaming people I'm not surprised people would rather use a friendlier language.

Well, what other way to influence behavior do we have?

If a dependency update breaks my code, it reduces my opinion of that dependency. But if it's the least-worse option, and it's free, I can't do much other than think negative thoughts.

Some, eg Clojure, have a culture of not breaking things. Having a library that remains unchanged for years is just fine.

Reply on news.ycombinator.com