> But they just refuse it, and even forbid discussing such topics on their subreddit - that alone shows me that the project is very user hostile currently. I doubt with that attitude they can make a turnaround, but I'd be happy to be wrong...
Somehow not surprising to me. Many large open source projects seem to be more about pushing a political agenda of some sort, rather than serving the interests of their users. Especially distributions, as a class of projects, are uniquely positioned to do that, as the role of a systems integrator doubles as the de-facto gatekeeper.
> Sadly the other bigger ROMs are to my knowledge not better in this category, neither /e/ with their service suite, nor DivestOS with the passionate developer nor CalyxOS or GrapheneOS with their "security" focus are interested in giving the user full access to their device.
I have no opinion on any of these except for GrapheneOS, but I totally understand why they wouldn't want the user to root their device - having root is indeed a security nightmare. I wrote about this more extensively in the context of traditional UNIX-like operating systems. I think it's a very good trade-off IF you provide the user with viable alternatives (let's remember, the original goal was to have unattended upgrades).
https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=32971677
> Android seems to be a dead end here, real Linux is needed.
That was my reflection in 2016, when I changed to SailfishOS full time, and remained the case in 2019, as I switched again, to iOS. I keep an Android device or two around just to keep testing the waters, but for my personal goal of having a usable phone without Google, indeed looks like a dead end.