Hacker News Reader

Comment by ok_dad | Hacker News Reader

I would pay literally anyone else 10x that price per user just to not use Atlassian software.

PM for Bitbucket pipelines here, my team of ~20 owns that feature E2W, would genuinely love to chat, share some stuff we're working on, and get feedback/thoughts.

Ping me if you're open to chatting emunday@atlassian.com

>atlassian.com.com

Is that an honest mistake or are you actually trying a phishing scam here?

Ahh f..k - phone keyboard, thank you, fixed now.

I'm glad you're working on BB. We switched to GitHub a year ago and are happy with it, but with a slightly better UI and more reliable/advanced CI/CD features, I might not have been able to justify the switch.

I get the feeling this sentiment is not necessarily because BB sucks, but because people don't trust Atlassian.

After the shit show last year with the week long outage and all the shit JIRA gets I don't think very highly of Atlassian as a company either.

No Datacenter edition (aka on-premise) disqualifies bb pipelines for a lot of premium/enterprise use-cases.

Bitbucket used to fall over for monorepos. Sometimes it would fall into a death spiral, sometimes it would attribute PRs and commits to the wrong engineers (!!!) Not sure if that's still the case, but it was awful working with it.

Don't even get me started on the dumpster fire that is Jira.

We 100% have had issues with larger repo's in the past while we were still hosted on a stand-alone data centre. Since finishing our migration to AWS ~12 months ago, all stability and performance metrics are substantially improved.

https://bitbucket.org/blog/bitbucket-cloud-has-landed-in-aws

Full disclosure, we do still have some work to do in terms of supporting very large repo's (>10GB non-LFS) - but those scenarios are still handled relatively gracefully.

Yep

Reply on news.ycombinator.com