China’s cities are on the verge of a debt crisis
economist.com
economist.com
https://www.investopedia.com/articles/investing/072815/how-d...
Most countries borrow money in order to create it. It does NOT get printed out of thin air. But China simply prints up and destroys money as it requires. It makes it impossible for people to use the same rules about the economy that seem to work to some degree in other places.
The U.S. Fed creates money out of thin air and then lends it to the Treasury. Eventually the Fed gets it back from the Treasury and deletes it.
China skips the lending step.
The difference between the two is merely a matter of accounting and at the end of the day, the accounting difference doesn't impact anything.
Why aren't other countries doing this?
Western economists have understood the concept of fiat currency for a very long time. The chinese have used fiat money since the 11th century - "Government-issued fiat money banknotes were used first during the 11th century in China".
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Fiat_money
And fiat money has been the dominant form of currency since the 1970s. "Since President Richard Nixon's decision to suspend US dollar convertibility to gold in 1971, a system of national fiat currencies has been used globally."
Why you think western economists don't understand something so basic as fiat currency is beyond me. Especially since it was the western economists who created the modern global economic order.
> I suppose they can't come out and say it because it would lead to very uncomfortable questions about why China can simply print money, but we have to get it from the banking cartel.
What uncomfortable question? Everyone knows about fiat currency and we are taught why we have a "banking cartel" in every econ 101 class. Put "china" next to any mundane topic and people get unhinged. The modern chinese economy was created primarily with the help of western economists. Nothing about the chinese economy is a mystery. Especially to western economists.