Maybe dumb question since I only have experience with a few lisps (Common Lisp, clojure and scheme) but why is this “lisp like” and not a “proper” lisp?
It looks like a lisp for me with its “code is data” (homoiconic) bit and s expressions.
It looks like a lisp for me with its “code is data” (homoiconic) bit and s expressions.
What even is a proper Lisp? http://steve-yegge.blogspot.com/2006/04/lisp-is-not-acceptab...
Anyway, back to the main point, thank you for the article. I'll try to play around with Dak later today and see if I can use it to do something fun. Play is better to learn something after all.
1: https://groups.google.com/g/comp.lang.lisp/c/Bj8Hx6mZEYI/m/6...