So much for "Open" AI.
Open-source algorithm? No.
Open access for free, or reasonable prices? No.
Open emails and conversations of directors (accountability)? No.
Open conversations of issues and ethics? No.
Open-source algorithm? No.
Open access for free, or reasonable prices? No.
Open emails and conversations of directors (accountability)? No.
Open conversations of issues and ethics? No.
The original point of openAI was to make sure google and facebook don't completely dominate AI and keep their work hidden due to the innovator's dilemma they face. Seems like they've absolutely accomplished that. Yes, they've stretched the meaning of "open" but I don't think they've ever tried to claim they had some sort of open source aspirations.
As for open access, that's usually defined as free of charge. E.g open access journals.
The publish their algorithms just fine and no one has had issues replicating their work.
The paper for that is linked from https://openai.com/research/instruction-following
[1] https://yaofu.notion.site/How-does-GPT-Obtain-its-Ability-Tr...
They do have newer models that aren't generally available that are different though.
I'm not sure they will necessarily live up to every definition of open you'll ever come up with, but its hardly the worst name in the tech space.
I'm still waiting for apple to deliver that tree to me. Facebook isn't a book AND the faces are almost always the smallest piece of content on a post (and some people's avatar isn't even their face!). Can't wait for my trip to the Amazon w/ Mr Bezos!
:)