“You’re a nice young man, but it’s Fourier analysis all the way down.” - DSP engineer to ML engineer (probably)
Edit: I missed the quip about the Kalman comment being in jest, my reply probably wasn’t necessary but I’ll leave it up.
1. Knowing when to use the right tool, and
2. Being in the right place at the right time to offer the insight.
What’s obvious to the expert is frequently intractable to the outsider. In many cases, I wouldn’t call it so much “avoidance” as “not knowing the solution exists at all”.
99% of the time it seems they're not wrong, despite control engineering being a pretty large area of research.
http://www.ecircuitcenter.com/Circuits/op_pid/op_pid.htm
https://www.nutsvolts.com/magazine/article/the_perceptron_ci...
maybe some s-plane control theory if you’re feeling fancy.
The next level up is obvious