Hacker News Reader

Comment by djtriptych | Hacker News Reader

Author on vim:

"MacVim: it’s Vim, need I say more? Actually, I do need to say more: I hate, hate, hate, hate, hate Vim – did I mention that I hate it? I just don’t get how anyone could like the antiquated Unix-originating Vim with it’s stupid modes, over any of the other options that are out there. Emacs was waaay better than Vim back in the day; nano is better than Vim now; and they both pale in comparison to Sublime, and the other feature rich editors listed here; and yet, excellent coders, such as Thomas Fuchs use this editor — like I said, I don’t get it"

Spoken like a man who has spent less than 10 minutes with it. vim rewards the patient practitioner with an unbeatable mind-editor connection over time, and self-reinforces universally good skills to have like touch-typing.

Still thankful for my mentor as a Google intern who told me on day 1: "learn python, learn vim."

Anyway, point is ACTA sucks.

View on HN

I have spent weeks with Vim. I hate it more the more I used it, and now I use sublime.

I don't mind other people choosing to use it, but I got more productive in 30 minutes of Sublime than 3 weeks of vim.

I think 3 weeks is not enough. It took me ~4 months before noticing significant efficiency gains.

I don't know about you, but I think 4 months is just way too long to expect someone to stick with it. I'm not going to invest months of time into a tool with no measurable benefit.

I used to think like that, then I realized, I am going to be editing text for at least the next 20-30 years (if not longer). I get the feeling vi(m) (and emacs) will be around then, so it's an investment worth making.

It only took a few weeks to reach the efficiency I had with TextMate, and every week since I've become more and more efficient. I haven't hit the point of diminishing returns in learning about my editor, and judging by other vim users I've seen, I probably won't for a long, long time.

If I was 100% sure vim was 'the answer', it would be worth spending 4 months on it.

But maybe emacs is the answer. Or eclipse. Or sublime text. Or Visual Studio.

Now, to give all these editors a fair shot, I'm planning on being considerably less efficient for well over a year (if none of these editors really suited me).

One measurable benefit to learning vim is being able to work just about any remote server.

I agree. Once you settle into vim, your productivity increases threefold. I can copy the contents of a string and paste it somewhere else in about 6 keystrokes.

I've not yet found anything that can compare.

In notepad it takes 4 keystrokes (ctrl+c, ctrl+v). The "mouse hampers productivity" viewpoint seems like a form of neckbeard neo-luddism to me. I mean, I hate visual IDEs (/cough Xcode) and WYSIWYGs as much as anybody. But the mouse was invented because keyboards suck at navigating. I love my mouse.

I like Yehuda Katz for trying to stick with TextMate, when he could have jumped on the emacs/vim bandwagon much sooner than he did. Maybe for a rockstar-ninja like Katz, it does result in a productivity increase.

But for myself (and most of the rest of us, I argue), the bottleneck in my productivity is most definitely not the speed at which I can copy/paste or any other mechanism involved in editing text and refactoring. Even without vim, I can already manipulate text FAR faster than I can think, architect, specify, and code.

The cynical atheist part of me says that emacs/vim is a hipster credential for regular people who just want to feel like rockstar-ninjas.

I can't imagine anyone who's spent 3+ months in Vim and hates it. It's become an extension of my fingers now, and I'm unbearably slow editing text without it.

I can't wait for Sublime Text 2 to have a fully developed Vintage mode so I can switch to the superior UI. But in terms of key bindings + modes, Vim is irreplaceable.

Musicians talk about freeing yourself from your instrument, after which your instrument allows you to express yourself, rather than being a thing that you consciously manipulate.

That's what you get from Vim (or Emacs), and it probably takes about as much time and work.

The problem is that I can't move everything I do over to vim. I can only seem to hard-wire one set of key shortcuts into my fingers, so when I've used vim for a while I keep mis-pressing when using Apple Mail, and when I've been eclipsing for a while (because I was working on a project which is already fully eclipsed up), I go back to vim and my fingers keep pressing cmd+z,x,c,v.

My suspicions as to why some people love vim, while I don't is:

1) They work in an environment where they can go 100% vim.

2) They find it easy to switch between two different sets of keys, without half an hour or so of mis-pressings.

I switch between different apps without any major pains, one thing I have noticed though is that I tend to use Cmd + x, c, v within MacVim anyway.

Yes, I know it is bad, but it lets me get work done quickly and efficiently and thus I really don't care what the purists say.

Maybe that is the key to success, don't let the purists say that you shouldn't do it, just do what feels natural and eventually it will help you get faster anyway.

Are they planning on making Vintage mode better? I just tried it, and there's a lot of unexpected behavior. It jumps into insert mode for commands that shouldn't and so on.

I hope so. In it's current form, I can't switch from Vim.

It's emacs for me but I agree with your thought on the patient practitioner and the mind editor connection. I also think a decent keyboard is part of that connection.

I did like the article; the graphic was a good image to see where I may have some holes and gave me some ideas for how to fill them.

I thought he was unnecessarily harsh re: Vim, which is my default text editor these days. That being said, Sublime Text 2 looks impressive in its own way.

Reply on news.ycombinator.com