I've said it was a lab leak from about month two of the pandemic.
Any sane person hearing me say this should assume I have low confidence as the sort of evidence necessary to prove this beyond a reasonable doubt is information a random hn commentor could not possibly have.
Unfortunately, even expressing that you thought it likely it was a lab leak was enough to get my accounts banned on several social media.
So if you 'said it was a lab leak', but expected people to know you really mean "based on the extremely limited information I have on the situation, it don't feel the possibly of it being a lab leak can not be entirely discounted", then you've communicated poorly.
You've said in this comment that "you thought it likely it was a lab leak". Again, that's not the words of someone with low confidence in their theory.
Then we have to come to your motives in espousing such a theory. What was your point in saying that then and now? Is it that you think the world in general should work towards better lab practices? If so why not say that instead. Why do you want people to know you think it was from a particular lab?
Just saying what you're saying sounds a lot like an anti-China dog-whistle, especially in the environment in which you're saying it.
Yes, if the virus were engineered or even just leaked from a wild source kept in the lab, we deserve to know, for a multitude of reasons.
Sorry, but if this is your best effort at explaining that post, then there is something deeply wrong with you.