Seems like a lot of people who want to be heard but don't like it when people actually listen
Social consequences is a cute term for savage justice.
No justice more savage than a bunch of people on Twitter saying mean things about you
True, just saying mean things isn't savage justice. Savage justice is when the lynch mob successfully bullies your employer into firing you.
After someone get fired from their job for saying something evil, they still have the freedom of speech to continue saying it.
Savage justice is when somebody comes to your house and beats you to death with a tire iron. People calling JK Rowling a hateful bigot on Twitter and telling people to stop purchasing Harry Potter content isn't that.
It's a cute term for freedom of association, which is a right even more fundamental than freedom of speech.
We have always understood that there are consequences of unpopular speech that are detached from whether that speech is good or necessary or correct. It's why we characterize people as courageous who fight long, but ultimately justified or righteous battles in the popular sphere. Courageous in the face of what? This! The negative social consequences of unpopular speech.
Why do you hate the freedom of speech? It seems odd that "free speech absolutists" only seem to care about the speech of right wing trolls and even want to curtail other people's freedom of speech and association in doing so.